
A combination of defeats in a clutch of state assemblies and desperation over having presided over one of the nation8217;s worst communal conflagrations ever, has sent the BJP scurrying to the comfort of familiar shibboleths. If this has lent a touch of the bizarre to the proceedings of the party8217;s national executive committee meeting at Panaji, it has rendered the prime minister positively transmogrified. It would be difficult to discern in the politician who addressed the Campal Maidan rally in Panaji on Friday, the man who had almost broken down in grief after visiting camps housing the riot-stricken in Gujarat just a few days earlier. If singing different tunes as the occasion demanded constitutes 8216;rajdharma8217;, than the nation would want no part of it.
Vajpayee is a BJP leader, and possibly a beleaguered one with his own political compulsions, but they cannot be allowed to overrule his constitutional obligations. And his constitutional obligations require that he is seen to uphold the principles of unity and fraternity at all times. For his Friday speech, however, the prime minister chose the language of sectarianism and retribution, words that bordered uncomfortably closely to Narendra Modi8217;s infamous action-reaction formulation. 8216;8216;If the Godhra incident had not happened then whatever followed would also not have happened,8217;8217; he had thundered. If this is not washing one8217;s hands of prime ministerial responsibility, what is? First, the tragic attack at Godhra should not have happened. But once it did, it was up to the Union and state governments to have ensured that 8216;8216;whatever followed8217;8217; did not in fact follow. It was the Modi government8217;s clear dereliction of duty in failing to control the riots, and indeed state complicity in them, that had led to a chorus of protests and the demand for his dismissal from parties across the political spectrum, including the BJP8217;s allies in the NDA government.