
Pushing the door open a bit wider for foreign direct investment seems to consume so much energy, there is little left for doing what is necessary to actually attract FDI. Funds are not going to flow in, like flies into a jar of honey, merely because the door is opened a fraction more. Given that global competition for capital is likely to become more intense, India can increase its share only with focussed and aggressive action. A number of other measures must be taken to boost FDI. The latest proposals from the group of ministers on foreign investment encompassing several sectors will,if approved by the cabinet, need to be accompanied by the removal of procedural hurdles, streamlined approval processes, promotional efforts abroad and, not least, selling the idea at home. Among the group8217;s recommendations are 100 per cent FDI in hotels and tourism, in subsidiaries of non-banking finance companies, in bulk drug manufacturing, in township development projects. FDI may be raised to 51 per cent from 40 per cent in domestic airlines.
The intentions are good but the will to convert them into action is often lacking. How much new FDI will flow in depends on improvements in various areas. Objections from the civil aviation ministry to raising the FDI ceiling for domestic airlines have not apparently been overcome as yet. And policy coherence has still to emerge. A draft aviation policy is being circulated and discussed with industry representatives and it will be some considerable time before it can be finalised. Among key issues up in the air is Sharad Yadav8217;s insistence on social obligations. He clearly would like to impose them on potential strategic partners of Air India and Indian Airlines and other domestic operators. The development objective 8212; flying unprofitable routes 8212; will not be in conflict with the interests of shareholders if a system of incentives rather than obligatory routes is used. The least that the government can do is sort out all such confusion quickly.