Premium
This is an archive article published on August 17, 2003

Sharp and Sweet

March 2001A bunch of arty types stand around in Renu Modi8217;s 8216;Gallery Espace8217; in Delhi, prior to her big show 8216;Kitsch Kit...

.

March 2001
A bunch of arty types stand around in Renu Modi8217;s 8216;Gallery Espace8217; in Delhi, prior to her big show 8216;Kitsch Kitsch Hota Hai8217; scheduled to open on the Ides of March, at the Visual Arts Gallery, India Habitat Centre. Various works have landed from elegant, eminent painters. But we8217;re watching the unwrapping of a huge cutout that8217;s just arrived from Bhupen Khakhar.

Excitement mounts as blistersheets unpeel. Who knows what Bhupen has chosen to unleash now? As a huge image of Mahavishnu appears, Madhu Jain, the curator, heaves a sigh loud enough to be heard in Baroda. But her relief is premature. On the reverse of a blandly smiling Preserver, is an oldish desi man in a dhoti so sheer that you can see his unmentionables painted with wicked visibility. A collective wail from ten nabhis: 8220;O God! Now there8217;ll be a Hindutva protest!8221; After much cogitation, someone comes up with the chilling Victorian notion of painting more white dhoti over the 8216;offensive8217; bits. It8217;s done, the show is a huge success without one Bajrangi whimper to mar proceedings and a splendid party is had by all. In the hullabaloo, however, Bhupen8217;s poignant cultural point seems lost. It is not sacrilege but a spiritual lament that he embodies in that cutout. The grubby man is the way we are, the 8220;vaasna ka bhandaar8221; as common man Sakharam Binder puts it Bhupen is big on the common man. But in him, in each of us, hetero/homo/bi, is that spark of Godhead, the Ultimate Self, for which Bhupen used his longtime leitmotif of calendar gods. I now think that it was Dhotibhai, the overt reality, who was supposed to face 8216;front8217;, not Mahavishnu the hidden Divine. Or was Dhotibhai meant to depict Shankerbhai Patel, the 20-years-older widower from East Africa? Bhupen, says film-maker-writer Sunil Mehra, was passionately attached to the seth for 15 years and was devastated when he died in 1975. But I couldn8217;t ask Bhupen8230;

September 2001
At Renu Modi8217;s haveli on the Ganga at Hardwar, it8217;s fun listening to Bhupen bitch in precise, irrefutable points about installation art. 8220;Goras did installations to break museum formality. But all of India, every subzi-redi is already an installation. We just uthao things blindly without thought of context!8221; I snicker, and win a big grin from Bhupen, who flowed self-taught into colour and form without seeming to haul the Brown Man8217;s burden of Western baggage. The moral? Why, London, Sao Paulo, Washington, Berlin caught on at once to his original work whereas India8217;s great art critic Charles Fabri merely curled his lip at Bhupen8217;s first show in 1965 at Jehangir Art Gallery, Mumbai. Bhupen seems most excited about the silent sadhus adorning the ghats in sundry levels of padmasana and begins work in a sun-dappled riverside room. But come evening, Bhupen gets into a Gregariously Gujju huddle with fellow painters Amit Ambalal, Atul and Anju Dodiya. Hostess Renu Modi, Sunil Mehra, dancer Navtej Johar and I feel rather left out. We leave them to snack and drink in their sitting room below and virtuously sip jaljeera upstairs. A call from Delhi throws us into frenzy. 9/11 is happening, the Twin Towers are crumbling on a spotty B038;W TV as everyone we shriek down for them gathers, jaws open. 8220;Look at the Ganga. She goes on like nothing happened!8221; someone says. 8220;Every moment, something is happening,8221; rebukes Bhupen gently. I don8217;t think he saw 9/11. Going by the Hardwar paintings exhibited in January 2003, it was Atul who saw the towers.

Bhupen was all Ganga. He never did see her again.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement