Premium
This is an archive article published on October 17, 2008

Oil ministry charges, Patel defends 145;defaulter146; airlines

Civil Aviation Minister Praful Patel defended delay by airline companies in payment of their fuel bills.

.

Civil Aviation Minister Praful Patel on Friday defended delay by airline companies in payment of their fuel bills saying they were not defaulters, but the Petroleum Ministry maintained that Jet Airways had defaulted on payment of Rs 259 crore to Indian Oil Corporation.

A day after the Petroleum Ministry gave details of the dues of Naresh Goyal8217;s Jet Airways and its new found ally Kingfisher, Patel told reporters in Parliament that airline had a 60-day period to make payments. 8220;So they cannot be branded as defaulters,8221; he said.

Petroleum Ministry, however, countered Patel saying Jet had failed to make payments even after expiry of the 60-day grace period.

Jet8217;s total outstanding to IOC, the nation8217;s largest oil firm, stood at Rs 859 crore, of which it had defaulted on payment of Rs 259-crore bills, which were due on September 25 and October 5 after the expiry of 60-day period, a senior official said.

Similarly, Kingfisher owed Rs 110 crore to IOC, of which Rs 60 crore remained unpaid after expiry of the credit period.

Jet owes Rs 284.3 crore to Bharat Petroleum while Kingfisher owes Rs 246 crore to BPCL and Rs 525 crore to HPCL.

8220;It is not correct to say that we are terming them defaulters just like that. We said they were defaulters because they failed to make payments even after 60-day credit period,8221; the official said.

Story continues below this ad

Petroleum Minister Murli Deora had personally brokered the 60-day credit deal between Jet8217;s Naresh Goyal and IOC Chairman Sarthak Behuria. Deora yesterday said he felt hurt when Goyal did not keep his word on making timely payments.

The official said both Jet and Kingfisher had to clear their outstanding at the earliest as state-run oil firms themselves were in difficult times.

8220;Our companies have a social obligation to fulfil. They sell subsidised cooking gas to households and even more subsidised kerosene to poor. They have been living on borrowed funds and need funds to keep these subsidised sales going,8221; he said.

IOC, BPCL and HPCL together lose about Rs 280 crore on sale of petrol, diesel, domestic LPG and kerosene. 8220;Do you now expect them to sell subsidised fuel to the rich travelling by air?8221; he said.

Story continues below this ad

The three companies had not received oil bonds, which are used to compensate for half of the losses they make on fuel sales, for past three quarters.

The combined borrowings of the three, which stood at Rs 48,400 crore in March 2007 and Rs 66,900 crore in March 2008, has increased to Rs 1,10,000 crore as of October.

They lose Rs 2.85 a litre on petrol, Rs 7.26 on diesel, Rs 29.19 on kerosene and Rs 335.03 per LPG cylinder and are projected to lose Rs 1,47,592 crore in revenues this fiscal.

The official said ATF was priced at import parity rates as if the fuel were to be imported because around 80 per cent of the crude oil used to make the fuel was imported at international rates.

Story continues below this ad

Pricing of ATF was de-regulated on April 1, 2001 and since then it has been governed by fluctuations in the global market. Over the base price, customs duty of 5 per cent, 8 per cent excise duty, 3 per cent education cess and sales tax at an average of 25 per cent is levied. State taxes and excise duty amounts to about a third of the ATF price.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement