Premium
This is an archive article published on September 20, 2005

Govt146;s I-T panel toughens norms on data theft, child porn

While ruling out Government regulation of the BPO industry, an expert committee, headed by Information Technology Secretary Brijesh Kumar, h...

.

While ruling out Government regulation of the BPO industry, an expert committee, headed by Information Technology Secretary Brijesh Kumar, has proposed radical amendments to the Information Technology Act 2000 to deal with the increasingly sensitive issue of data protection and personal privacy.

These include stringent provisions for child pornography8212;in tune with international norms8212;and a Rs 25 lakh penalty and a one-year imprisonment for what it called 8216;8216;video voyeurism.8217;8217;

On data theft, the committee has recommended a specific provision that makes the offence punishable with imprisonment upto one year.

But the committee has followed the American model8212;the question of prosecuting the offender will arise only on the complaint of the affected company or individual. This in contrast to the European one where there is a government-appointed regulator.

In other words, the police in India will not be able to book cases on their own under the proposed provision on data theft.

As regards civil liability for data theft, the committee said that the existing provision of making the offender pay compensation was not adequate.

It suggested that the body corporate that 8216;8216;owns or handles sensitive personal data8217;8217; and is 8216;8216;found to have been negligent in maintaining reasonable security practices8217;8217; should be liable to pay damages up to Rs 1 crore.

Story continues below this ad

Set up as it was in the wake of last year8217;s MMS scandal involving two Delhi schoolchildren, the committee suggested the retention of the provision on pornography 8216;8216;in view of the cultural sensitiveness of our society.8217;8217;

The committee nevertheless proposed three major changes regarding pornography.

8226; That the maximum term of imprisonment should be reduced from five years to two years.

8226; That a service provider like baazee.com in the MMS case should be liable for having 8216;8216;conspired or abetted in the commission of the unlawful act.8217;8217; And not simply for 8216;8216;having the knowledge8217;8217; of the violation, as the current law says.

8226; If it involves child pornography, the penalty, in keeping with the global trend, should be higher and go up to seven years.

Story continues below this ad

Under the head of 8216;8216;breach of confidentiality and privacy,8217;8217; the committee recommended a liability of compensation up to Rs 25 lakhs and imprisonment up to one year on anybody who captures or broadcasts an image of 8216;8216;a private area of an individual8217;8217; without his/her consent and 8216;8216;under circumstances violating the privacy of that individual.8217;8217;

To obviate scope for such a provision being misused, the committee took pains to define each of the terms mentioned in it.

8226; 8216;8216;A private area of the individual8217;8217; means the 8216;8216;naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks or female breasts of that individual.8217;8217;

8226; 8216;8216;Female breast8217;8217; means 8216;8216;any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola.8217;8217;

Story continues below this ad

8226; 8216;8216;Under circumstances violating the privacy of that individual8217;8217; means i circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that he or she could disrobe in privacy without being concerned that an image of a private area of the individual was being captured; or ii circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that a private area of the individual would not be visible to the public, regardless of whether that person is in a public or private place.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement