Exposingtheleft.blog is dangerous

This may be offensive and so could the rest of this website8212;but largely for anti-Bush voters in the United States as it tracks domestic politics, takes several swipes at Iran, applauds a court ruling against same-sex marriages, and slams the Hizbollah. It has little to do with what Comrade Prakash Karat was thinking about or doing on 7/11.

ExposingTheLeft8217;s editors are aware of India8217;s gag order and their new post is: 8220;Well, it8217;s not a fatwa but I suppose it will have to do.8217;8217;

Government officials today defended their action against the three blogspot.com sites and eight other websites they have ordered Internet Service Providers ISPs to block from Indian viewers. Several Department of Telecom officials, contacted through the day, declined to comment. An official in charge of cybersecurity said: 8220;Google should take the initiative to block sites that are offensive to us. If it doesn8217;t, we have to take such action.8221;

All banned blogs are being hosted on a website that Google owns. The websites are hosted both in India and abroad, which complicates matters, since bloggers are being forced out of their blogs because of the ban.

8216;8216;There are ways to bypass the ban which makes it ineffectual, but there8217;s another complication, it8217;s not easy for India to block blogs selectively if they are not hosted here,8217;8217; says Supreme Court lawyer Pavan Duggal.

The effort to ban is also out of tune with a new Amnesty International attempt supported by Republicans in the US to help sites like Yahoo! resist censorship attempts abroad.

The other blogspot sites that the Government ordered a ban on: CommonFolkCommonSense.blogspot.com and PajamaEditors.blogspot.com, which plays on the word Mujahadeen Pajama-hadeen.

Curiously, a fourth blogspot site, PrincessKimberly.blogspot.com, is on the Government8217;s blacklist. It hosts only a woman8217;s rantings over how she 8216;8216;is bored.8217;8217;

Mypetjava.mu.nu, another site in the gag order, is still up and running but Hinduhumanrights.com/hindufocus.html is gone as is Dalitstan.org, which the world outside India can see refers to 8216;8216;Brahmin Indira Gandhi8217;8217; and other personalities who have been 8216;8216;at war8217;8217; with India8217;s Dalits.

RahulYadav.com, viewed through a search engine, displays aspirations to 8216;8216;liberate8217;8217; Kashmiri Hindus, and is gone too.

Several experts pointed out that India was not alone in trying cyberspace censorship but India8217;s position is slightly muddled by the fact that the Information Technology Act, 2000, is silent on blogs or blogging. Officials in the Ministry of Information Technology cite a July 14, 2003 gazette notification that gives the government rights to restrict access to the Internet.

The notification lists five parameters that can allow blocking of websites, which include threats to sovereignty, security of the country, friendly relations with another nation, public order or to prevent a cognizable offense.

The blacklist

The restricted blogs and web sites sent to ISPs:

8226; pajamaeditor.blogspot.com

8226; exposingtheleft.blogspot.com

8226; princesskimberly.blogspot.com

8226; commonfolkcommonsense.blogspot

8226; mypetjava.mu.nu

8226; thepirateco.us

8226; hinduhumanrights.com/hindufocus.html

8226; rahulyadav.com

8226; dalitstan.com

8226; macker-old.com

8226; merrimusings.typepad.com