Premium
This is an archive article published on July 27, 2007

A Kind of Magic

J.K. Rowling’s skill lies in her ability to bring the world of magic so tantalisingly close to us

.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
J.k. rowling
Bloomsbury, Rs 895

There was so much excess associated with the release of J.K. Rowling’s seventh — and insistently last — book of the series, that you just had to wonder. Why did newspaper reports, television broadcasts and Internet sites desist from revealing every surprise? Why did hardly any one of the instant reviews not try to at least provoke by taking a critical view? After all, in mass media, the bigger the event the more pressure to produce contrarian views, even if they have to be contrived.

To answer these questions, glance away from them and consider this. There is a dominant view being expressed that while Rowling has magnificently brought closure to her series, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is, at its core, a marketing phenomenon.

Perhaps. But in this age of fragmented discourse, it is also an event of immense unifying power. For more than a weekend, the book kept vast numbers of people on the same pages … and certainly that is a marketing success. But it is so much more. For just a few days, the Potter book brought readers of vastly different inclinations, ages and cultures into a common conversation.

Perhaps those questions need to be reframed like this: why do Potter books work? Yes, they are derivative. Perhaps there are even better books on fantasy and magic currently being sent out to bookstores. And, certainly, Rowling is a clumsy writer at times. But that becomes so irrelevant upon reading her books, especially this last one in which she has been so large-hearted to her readership by bringing, so commandingly, different threads from the earlier six books to closure.

Those of us who read each book as it was published would confess to an unstated apprehension that the closing book would not hold. That doubt, in effect, put on hold the question, why are Rowling’s books so magical?

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows works so well — with even anticipated twists unfolding in a special way — that to read it is to know. Rowling has kept us interested by placing her magical world so coherently in consonance with the non-magical world. Remember C.S. Lewis had to resort to a sleight to undertake the comings and goings between the two worlds — when the kids returned from Narnia, time would not have moved in the non-magical, real world.

Story continues below this ad

For Rowling, wizards and witches inhabit the same world and time moves along the same arrow. They live side by side. In her narratives, it is just that we Muggles (people without magical powers) often don’t realise that some curious happenings around us are not figments of our imagination; it’s just wizards going about their business. And if something is beyond the observation of Muggles, it is because protective spells and enchantments have been cast to keep them out of view.

In fact, as the battlelines get drawn between good and evil in this book — with Voldemort gathering his forces for a final hunt for Harry Potter, and Potter leading the quest for the Horcruxes in which Voldemort had stashed parts of his soul — a good way of determining on which side a character is by noting their views of Muggles. The forces of evil hate Muggles and want to keep wizards free of any contact with them. The forces of good keep insisting on a common humanity.

Perhaps this is why you don’t have to be child to feel the compulsion to look around you a bit curiously after reading this book. And that feat has to be an act of magic.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement