This is an archive article published on October 13, 2019
Summit to summit, Wuhan to Chennai: Some changes, some similarities
From ‘Wuhan Spirit’ in April 2018 to ‘Chennai Connect’ in October 2019, a look at the distance travelled between the two informal summits involving Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping
Mahabalipuram | Updated: October 13, 2019 12:22 PM IST
3 min read
Whatsapp
twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (right) meets with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Mamallapuram, India. (Press Information Bureau via AP)
Border
Mahabalipuram: The two leaders welcomed the work of the Special Representatives on the boundary question, and in trying to arrive at a mutually acceptable settlement based on political parameters and guiding principles agreed upon in 2005. They reiterated that efforts would continue for peace and tranquillity in border areas, and on additional Confidence Building Measures.
Wuhan: The 2018 meeting took place in the backdrop of the Doklam stand-off. In the statement of the two leaders, there was a call for the Special Representatives to “intensify” their efforts for a settlement. They also issued “strategic guidance” to respective militaries to strengthen communication in order to “build trust and mutual understanding” and enhance “predictability and effectiveness” in the management of border affairs.
Terrorism
Story continues below this ad
Mahabalipuram: The leaders agreed that terrorism continued to pose a common threat, and recognised the need to make “joint efforts” to ensure that the international community strengthens the framework against terror.
Wuhan: Modi and Xi reiterated their resolute opposition to terrorism in all its forms, and committed themselves to cooperate against it.
Economy
Mahabalipuram: A big takeaway from the Indian perspective was the announcement of a high-level mechanism for trade, headed by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and Chinese Vice Premier Hu Chunhua, to better balance trade and encourage mutual investments.
Wuhan: The two leaders agreed to promote bilateral trade and investment in a balanced and sustainable manner through complementarities between their two economies.
Disputes
Story continues below this ad
Mahabalipuram: The consensus evolved in Astana in June 2017, that differences should not become disputes, was finally made a part of the Indian statement. The two leaders reiterated the Wuhan agreement that India and China are factors for stability in the current international landscape. They also decided to continue with the informal summits.
Wuhan: While welcoming the opportunity offered by the 2018 informal summit, the leaders hoped that peaceful, stable and balanced relations between India and China would be a positive factor for stability amidst global uncertainties, and go on to create the conditions for an Asian Century.
Strategic communication
Mahabalipuram: Originally a Chinese idea, but now India has adopted the idea of “strategic communication” and leader-driven mechanism. Modi and Xi agreed to enhance communication on all matters of mutual interest, and continue the momentum of high-level exchanges. 2020 would be marked as Year of India-China Cultural and People to People Exchanges, involving respective legislatures, political parties, cultural and youth organisations and militaries. 70 activities are planned, including a sea voyage tracing the historical connect between the two civilisations.
Wuhan: Modi and Xi agreed on the need to strengthen strategic communication through greater consultation.
Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor at The Indian Express, has been a journalist for more than 25 years now. Roy joined The Indian Express in October 2003 and has been reporting on foreign affairs for more than 17 years now. Based in Delhi, he has also led the National government and political bureau at The Indian Express in Delhi — a team of reporters who cover the national government and politics for the newspaper. He has got the Ramnath Goenka Journalism award for Excellence in Journalism ‘2016. He got this award for his coverage of the Holey Bakery attack in Dhaka and its aftermath. He also got the IIMCAA Award for the Journalist of the Year, 2022, (Jury’s special mention) for his coverage of the fall of Kabul in August 2021 — he was one of the few Indian journalists in Kabul and the only mainstream newspaper to have covered the Taliban’s capture of power in mid-August, 2021. ... Read More