Can heart attacks be predicted with an ear lobe crease?

The earlobe crease is already known as the Frank’s sign, so named after Sanders Frank, an American doctor who first described it. There have been at least 40 studies on the subject but none has been able to prove a clinical link between the folds in the ear lobe and an increased risk of atherosclerosis, a condition where plaque deposits clog up your arteries. The conclusion is based on the theory that both may be caused by similar processes. Both heart and ear lobes are supplied by end arteries, so the supposition is that once they lose blood supply, they get affected. Some experts theorised that the ear lobe crease is associated with the loss of elastin and elastic fibres in the elderly. The same applies to all blood vessels, even those in the heart and hence the rapid conclusion. A 2021 study found that people with earlobe creases and coronary artery diseases have low adropin and irisin levels, a type of protein, as well as low levels of the Klotho hormone, which is associated with premature ageing and endothelial dysfunction. There are similarities between cell damage of every kind but all theories cannot be assumed to be an alarm for cardiovascular diseases unless they are proven.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Sonam Singh (Functional Medicine + Ayurveda + Yoga) (@ayurveda_sonam)

WHY MISINFORMATION MUST STOP

It is essential to debunk such myths as perpetuating misinformation can have serious consequences for public health. As a cardiologist, I firmly assert that ear lobe crease, folds or distance have no proven correlation with cardiovascular disease (CVD), and it is crucial to rely on evidence-based assessment for accurate risk evaluation.

First, cardiovascular disease is a complex condition influenced by a multitude of factors such as genetics, lifestyle, diet and medical history. While some external signs may be indicative of underlying health issues, ear lobe aberrations are not among them. The only reliable indicator of heart health involves a comprehensive assessment of several markers, including blood pressure, cholesterol, family history, lifestyle anomalies, diabetes, kidney function and so on.

Second, in the absence of peer-reviewed studies or clinical trials validating this theory, it is imperative to dismiss it. Public health initiatives must prioritise disseminating accurate information. Encouraging individuals to base their perceptions of heart health on scientifically validated parameters helps in fostering a better understanding of cardiovascular risk factors and promotes proactive measures for prevention.

Moreover, promoting awareness about established risk factors such as smoking, poor diet, sedentary lifestyle and genetic predisposition is vital for preventing cardiovascular disease. Emphasizing regular health check-ups, consultations with healthcare professionals, and adherence to evidence-based guidelines are essential components of any effective public health strategy.