Premium
This is an archive article published on September 1, 2024

How Telegram CEO Pavel Durov’s arrest in France could possibly upend ‘safe harbour’ protection

How can a platform that allows its users to post their independent content be held liable for what appears on it? That is the heart of the safe harbour logic. How could France then arrest the chief of Telegram?

Telegram Pavel Durov FrenchPavel Durov, founder of the Russian social media giant Vkontakte, at a tech industry conference in San Francisco, Dec. 2, 2014. (File Photo - New York Times/Jim Wilson)

The significance of the French police’s move to take into custody the head of messaging platform Telegram as he stepped off a private jet near Paris on August 24 goes beyond the arrest itself, and the subsequent diplomatic fracas it set off with Moscow.

The action against Russian-born billionaire Pavel Durov could mark the end of an era in which heads of technology companies had relatively little liability for the content on their platforms.

There is no real precedent for this type of action — wherein someone in a significant position of power in the tech industry has been arrested over allegations that their encrypted messaging app is complicit in allowing illicit activities by users.

Charges against Durov

Telegram is alleged to have allowed illicit content linked to drug trafficking, child pornography, violent propaganda, and organised crime. Durov himself is not charged with any of these offences — instead, French prosecutors have pressed charges relating to about a dozen offences related to the app, which claims it has close to 1 billion users, enabling users to facilitate illicit activities and for not cooperating with law enforcement.

Analysts say Durov’s arrest serves as a warning to the heads of other tech companies who are seen as dragging their feet on moderating objectionable content.

Durov, a French and Emirati dual citizen who was born in St Petersburg to a Russian father and Ukrainian mother, has since been released from custody, but barred from leaving the country. He could face a possible prison sentence in France in the coming months.

Russia, the country that Durov was forced to leave in 2014 after ostensibly refusing demands from Moscow to share information on alleged dissidents supporting Ukraine, is now backing him as French authorities begin legal proceedings.

Story continues below this ad

Safe harbour rules

The legal action initiated by the French authorities against Durov impinges on the protection that is accorded to social media platforms across jurisdictions under a provision known as “safe harbour”.

The basic premise of safe harbour protection is: since social media platforms cannot control at the first instance what users post, they should not be held legally liable for any objectionable content that they host, provided they are willing to take down such content when flagged by the government or courts.

Since social media platforms are generally understood to be crucial tools of free speech, safe harbour is viewed as a basic tenet of enabling freedom of expression on these platforms.

In the United States, this protection is available to social media platforms under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Section 79 of India’s Information Technology Act, 2000 is somewhat similar — it classifies social media platforms as intermediaries and broadly shields them from legal action over the content that users post.

Story continues below this ad

A contested area

There have been attempts to dilute these rules, primarily by national governments that aim to exert pressure on social media companies over alleged failure to comply with takedown requests. India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology issued notices to YouTube, Telegram, and X in October 2023, asking them to remove all content related to child sexual abuse from their platforms.

In India, certain officials from the social media company in question can be legally prosecuted if the platform violates laid-down rules. Under The Information Technology Rules, 2021, social media companies with more than 5 million Indian users have to appoint a chief compliance officer who can be held criminally liable if the platform does not adhere to a takedown request, or violates other norms. However, the government has not so far exercised this power.

Under a new framework called the Digital India Bill, which is expected to succeed The Information Technology Act, 2000, the government has considered at various times whether safe harbour protections should be available to social media platforms. There is apprehension that the algorithms these platforms deploy potentially editorialises content on these sites.

Free speech experts, however, see safe harbour as a critical tool for free expression online. While there are reservations that free speech on these platforms often gets conflated with advocating for the companies’ interest, it is largely believed in civil society discourse that these platforms are a crucial promoter of free expression.

Soumyarendra Barik is a Special Correspondent with The Indian Express, specializing in the complex and evolving intersection of technology, policy, and society. With over five years of newsroom experience, he is a key voice in documenting how digital transformations impact the daily lives of Indian citizens. Expertise & Focus Areas Barik’s reporting delves into the regulatory and human aspects of the tech world. His core areas of focus include: The Gig Economy: He extensively covers the rights and working conditions of gig workers in India. Tech Policy & Regulation: Analysis of policy interventions that impact Big Tech companies and the broader digital ecosystem. Digital Rights: Reporting on data privacy, internet freedom, and India's prevalent digital divide. Authoritativeness & On-Ground Reporting: Barik is known for his immersive and data-driven approach to journalism. A notable example of his commitment to authentic storytelling involves him tailing a food delivery worker for over 12 hours. This investigative piece quantified the meager earnings and physical toll involved in the profession, providing a verified, ground-level perspective often missing in tech reporting. Personal Interests Outside of the newsroom, Soumyarendra is a self-confessed nerd about horology (watches), follows Formula 1 racing closely, and is an avid football fan. Find all stories by Soumyarendra Barik here. ... Read More

Anil Sasi is the National Business Editor at The Indian Express, where he steers the newspaper’s coverage of the Indian economy, corporate affairs, and financial policy. As a senior editor, he plays a pivotal role in shaping the narrative around India's business landscape. Professional Experience Sasi brings extensive experience from some of India’s most respected financial dailies. Prior to his leadership role at The Indian Express, he worked with: The Hindu Business Line Business Standard His career trajectory across these premier publications demonstrates a consistent track record of rigorous financial reporting and editorial oversight. Expertise & Focus With a deep understanding of market dynamics and policy interventions, Sasi writes authoritatively on: Macroeconomics: Analysis of fiscal policy, budgets, and economic trends. Corporate Affairs: In-depth coverage of India's major industries and corporate governance. Business Policy: The intersection of government regulation and private enterprise. Education Anil Sasi is an alumnus of the prestigious Delhi University, providing a strong academic foundation to his journalistic work. Find all stories by Anil Sasi here ... Read More

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement