Premium
This is an archive article published on August 9, 2016

NEET paper leak: SC refuses to interfere into the probe, petition withdrawn

The Court has granted permission to the petitioner to approach the Uttarakhand High Court

neet, latest news on neet, aipmt, neet news, neet aipmt govt, neet information, aipmt latest news, neet latest news, sc on neet, cbse neet, aipmt 2016, neet 2016, govt verdict on neet, education news

The Supreme Court has today refused to interfere in the plea seeking probe by the Uttarakhand Police into alleged paper leak of National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) phase 2. The petition was mentioned by senior advocate Sanjay Hedge. However, the Court has granted permission to the petitioner to approach the Uttarakhand High Court.

“Courts cannot monitor this. Courts are not meant for this, SSP (Haldwani) and others are looking into the matter
and let them do the investigation,” a bench of Justices A R Dave and L Nageswara Rao said.

Story continues below this ad

The plea was filed by NEET aspirant Anshul Sharma who demanded a status report into the alleged leakage of question papers which should be submitted before the court.

“We have withdrawn the petition. The Supreme Court has granted us liberty to appeal to the Uttarakhand High Court. We have not decided whether we’ll go there or not,” said Vaibhav Srivastav, advocate looking the matter of petitioner Anshul Sharma.

Read: NEET paper leak: Fresh petition likely to be filed in the Uttarakhand High Court

NEET phase 2 was conducted on July 24.

The CBSE has already denied any paper leak and has said they had matched the original question paper of NEET 2 and found that the seized material is entirely different from the original question paper of the entrance test.

Story continues below this ad

Moreover, the petition cited Tanvi Sarwal’s case where the apex court has ordered the Board to reconduct All India Pre-Medical / Pre-Dental Entrance Test (AIPMT which is now NEET) 2015 when the allegations regarding leakage of the paper in Haryana was found to be prima facie correct on the basis of the status reports submitted by the Haryana Police. Even then the CBSE was in denial mode but on the basis of investigation report by police, the Court directed re-examination of AIPMT 2015 within a period of four weeks.

For more news on NEET, click here

Neeti Nigam leads the education department at indianexpress.com. She joined the Indian Express in 2015 and has set up the education and job sections in the online department. She covers schools and higher education, entrance and board exams, study abroad, civil services and other career-related news. Prior to that, she worked as a lifestyle and entertainment journalist in The Pioneer newspaper's magazine division. Besides working in the in-flight Air India (Namaskaar) magazine, she was part of the launch team of Indian Railways on-board magazine Rail Bandhu. She has also worked as a city reporter covering north Delhi in Hindustan Times. In 2012, she covered the MCD elections. You can write to her at neeti.nigam@indianexpress.com ... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement