Premium

Bombay HC grants bail to Elgaar Parishad case accused Hany Babu, cites prolonged incarceration without trial

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) sought a stay on the operation of the Hany Babu bail order to appeal before the Supreme Court.

Hany BabuThe Bombay High Court has granted bail to former Delhi University associate professor Hany Babu, accused in Elgaar Parishad case.

The Bombay High Court Thursday granted bail to former Delhi University associate professor Hany Babu, accused in the Elgaar Parishad case, on the ground of prolonged incarceration of over five years without trial.

A division bench of Justices Ajey S Gadkari and Ranjitsinha R Bhonsale concluded the hearing and reserved its verdict on October 3, which was pronounced on Thursday. It directed Babu’s release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh along with sureties of the same amount.

While the National Investigation Agency (NIA) sought a stay on the operation of the bail order so as to appeal before the Supreme Court, the HC refused the request, stating that Babu has been in jail for over five years.

On May 2 this year, Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh and Advocate Chintan Shah for NIA initially opposed Babu’s plea, stating that his appeal, filed in 2024 after a delay of over two years, challenging the February 2022 order of the special court designated under the NIA Act, was not maintainable.

Singh argued that the trial court’s order was challenged before the HC by Babu, and a coordinate bench dismissed it in September 2022. The Supreme Court, in May last year, dismissed his appeal as he had not pursued it further. Singh added that the apex court had not interfered in the HC’s order; therefore, he should have filed a fresh application before the trial court.

Advocate Yug Mohit Chaudhry, who represented Babu, had then said that his client would delete his prayer challenging the February 2022 trial court order, and the HC may consider his plea as a regular bail application on the grounds of delay in conducting the trial and not on merits.

Chaudhry had emphasised the change in circumstances: after the HC passed its September 2022 bail rejection order, eight co-accused were released on bail by the Supreme Court or the High Court; therefore, Babu was also entitled to seek bail on the ground of prolonged incarceration without trial.

Story continues below this ad

The Justice Gadkari-led bench then asked Babu to seek the necessary clarification from the SC. After the SC asked him to approach either the trial court or HC seeking bail plea, the Justice Gadkari-led bench began hearing Babu’s bail plea.

Chaudhry argued that there was an inordinate delay in the trial and that the prosecution had not yet responded to Babu’s discharge application, filed two years ago.

The lawyer added that while the high court, on January 8 this year, while granting bail to co-accused Rona Wilson and Sudhir Dhawale, had directed the trial court to complete the trial within nine months, the same had not yet proceeded further.

Babu, presently lodged in Taloja Central Prison, sought bail on the ground that he spent over five years in prison without any trial. He was arrested on July 28, 2020.

Story continues below this ad

On the other hand, ASG Singh said that while NIA had filed its reply against Babu’s discharge plea, the special court had decided to hear all discharge pleas together, which was the cause of the delay. Singh said that Babu’s incarceration period was shorter than other co-accused.

Who got bail and who remains behind bars in Elgaar Parishad case?

The Pune police arrested 16 people in connection with the case in 2018, and another seven were held by NIA after it took over the investigation in January 2020. Among those arrested were prominent lawyers, activists and academics, who were accused of being members of the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist), and furthering the cause of the Maoists.

Among the 16 accused, Father Stan Swamy, an 84-year-old priest and tribal rights activist based in Jharkhand, passed away in custody in July 2021.

Ten accused, including Varavara Rao, Sudha Bharadwaj, Anand Teltumbde, Vernon Gonsalves, Arun Ferreira, Shoma Sen, Gautam Navlakha, Sudhir Dhawale, and Rona Wilson, were given bail and were released.

Story continues below this ad

Last month, the Supreme Court granted interim bail to Jyoti Jagtap. Accused Mahesh Raut was also released on six-week medical bail by the Supreme Court, which was later extended.

Lawyer Surendra Gadling and cultural artists and activists Sagar Gorkhe and Ramesh Gaichor are yet to get regular bail.

Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions. Expertise & Authority Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage. Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in: Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include: Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes). Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty). Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict. Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability. Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges. Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement