Premium
This is an archive article published on March 16, 2023

2015 Kotkapura police firing: Faridkot Court denies relief to Sukhbir Badal, but grants pre-arrest bail to his father

The order states that if arrested, he will be released on bail upon furnishing personal bond of  INR 5 lakh with one surety.

Sukhbir Badal denied bail in Kotkapura firing caseThe incident took place when the SAD-BJP combine was in power in the state. (Express file)
Listen to this article
2015 Kotkapura police firing: Faridkot Court denies relief to Sukhbir Badal, but grants pre-arrest bail to his father
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

A court in Punjab’s Faridkot Thursday dismissed the anticipatory bail plea of former deputy chief minister Sukhbir Singh Badal in the 2015 Kotkapura police firing incident but granted relief to his father and former chief minister Parkash Singh Badal.

The court of additional district and sessions judge Rajiv Kalra directed the former CM, who is also Shiromani Akali Dal patron, to surrender before the local magistrate within 15 days. If arrested, Badal will be released on bail upon furnishing personal bond of  Rs 5 lakh with one surety, states the order. However, he must comply with the conditions envisaged under Sections 438(2) and 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it added.

The father-son duo on March 9 had moved the Faridkot court for anticipatory bail through their counsel Shiv Kartar Singh Sekhon. After hearing the arguments on March 14 and 15, the court had reserved its order.

“The court dismissed the anticipatory bail plea of Sukhbir Singh Badal. However, it granted the same to the former chief minister,” said Arshdeep Singh Cheema, one of the lawyers who appeared for the Badals.

The Special Investigation Team of Punjab Police, led by ADGP LK Yadav, probing the police firing case last month had filed a charge sheet in a Faridkot court naming the Badals and then DGP Sumedh Saini and others.

Sukhbir and Saini were named as “masterminds of conspiracy for use of illegal excessive force to hide the inaction” of the state on three sacrilege incidents in Faridkot. The then chief minister Badal was blamed for “facilitating the execution of the conspiracy” in the 7,000-page chargesheet.

It was on March 6 that the Badals, Saini, and five other police officers — former Faridkot SSP Sukhmander Singh Mann, former DIG Amar Singh Chahal, former IG Paramraj Umranangal, former Moga SSP Charanjeet Singh Sharma, and former SHO Kotkapura Gurdeep Singh Randhaw — named in the chargesheet were issued notices in the Kotkapura firing case, and asked to be present before the court on March 23.

Story continues below this ad

The court of judicial magistrate first class Ajaypal Singh had denied the application of Badals on March 6 in which they had sought a copy of the chargesheet. They were told that copies will be given on the day the accused have been called in the court.

Explained
SAD chief in trouble

Already relegated to the sidelines on the polktical scene, the Akali Dal is now facing a peculiar dilemma with the man helming its affairs for long facing imminent arrest. For the ‘panthic’ party, it is a double blow as 2015 sacrilege and the subesquent police firing incidents are often touted as the reason that set its downfall in motion .

Apart from indicting Badals and Saini, the chargesheet blamed police officers Param Raj Umranangal, Amar Singh Chahal, Sukhmander Singh Mann, and Charanjit Singh Sharma for “executing the conspiracy”. It also indicted Gurdeep Singh Randhawa for distortion and concealment of facts.

The Yadav-led SIT is probing two FIRs pertaining to the Kotkapura firing incident – filed on October 14, 2015, and August 7, 2018. Two people were killed in Behbal Kalan and a few others were injured in Kotkapura on October 14, 2015, when the police opened fire on people protesting against the theft of a ‘bir’ of the Guru Granth Sahib, recovery of sacrilegious posters, and alleged tearing of pages of the holy book at Bargari in Faridkot.

The incident took place when the SAD-BJP combine was in power in the state.

Story continues below this ad

Of the 7,000-page chargesheet, 1,400 pages are on culpability, while the remaining 5,600 pages are documents and electronic evidence. The charges have been filed under Sections 307, 120B, 153, 119, 109, 34, 201, 217, 218, 167, 193, 465, 466, 471, 427, 323, 324, and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 25, 27, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement