This is an archive article published on March 9, 2017

Opinion Reality Check

Steve Smith ‘brain fade’ during the Bangalore Test was cricket’s post-Truth moment.

indus water treaty, indus water agreement, india pakistan indus river, indus river conflict, indian express news, india news, latest newsElection Results 2017, Elections 2017, BJP elections, BJP UP results, BJP Uttarakhand results, Narendra Modi elections, BJP, Modi wave, EVMs, election EVMs, India news
indianexpress

By: Editorial

March 9, 2017 12:06 AM IST First published on: Mar 9, 2017 at 12:06 AM IST

Cricket, Steve Smith, Australia Steve Smith, Bangalore Test, India Australia Test, Virat Kohli, Kohli Smith, ICC, India Virat Kohli, India test Bangalore, Sports news

The surreal bonhomie has ended. And, finally, we have what we expect from an India-Australia series: Acrimony, controversy and a lot of bad blood. There had actually even been talk of “respect” between the two teams till Steve Smith turned around after being adjudged leg before in Bangalore for help from the dressing room regarding a potential DRS call; the Aussie skipper explained that he had a brain fade. At that precise moment, things turned ugly. On a day India posted one of their most dramatic Test wins, the headlines were dominated by captain Virat Kohli alleging that the Aussies had “crossed the line”. He stopped just short of calling his counterpart a “cheat”.

Advertisement

The incident has exposed the ambiguity that exists in the ICC match referee exercising the rule regarding off-field assistance while reviewing a decision. The law states a captain or batsman can review an umpiring decision without any direct or indirect assistance from off the field. It seems like the most obvious attempt at gamesmanship you would imagine a team indulging in with regard to the DRS. More often than not, a player reviews an umpire’s decision depending solely on his gut-call. The same goes with the captain who’s relying on the instinct of his bowler or wicket keeper, if not his own. So, who wouldn’t want a suggestion from those in the dressing room who have seen a close-up on TV? Only that it is against the laws.

At a time when the ICC is clamping down on a number of long-standing issues like the size of bats and bad behaviour, they will have to put a check on this unfair practice. For, it doesn’t always even need to be as blatant as Smith at Chinnaswamy Stadium. A fielding team could easily have an outfielder relaying a “yes” or “no” from the change rooms, or even through a predetermined signal. The closest scenario to this that they’ve handled in the past is when the South African coach had his captain, Hansie Cronje, wired up during the 1999 World Cup.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments