Opinion Mallikarjun Kharge can succeed only if he builds a broad social coalition

While both Kharge and Tharoor are different kinds of elites, Kharge came across as penurious before Tharoor’s social and cultural capital during the campaign. This despite his long decades in the power game. The pride and prejudice that Tharoor could ignite in the public space was unprecedented. It somewhat exposed the pretensions of India’s anglophone liberals who embrace select universal values but grow blind when specifics like caste and class are placed before them.

Tharoor, during the campaign, made the exigency for reform inside the Congress party entirely about himself. He made everybody else look dilapidated and defunct. Kharge, however, was cautious and calculative about everything, including the role of the Nehru-Gandhi family. That the Nehru-Gandhis cannot be dismissed outright or overnight is a reality one has to contend with, but Tharoor was being either delusional about it or was deliberately constructing false hope for his fan base. A certain arrogance took charge of his rhetoric and made it seem like his real challenge was only Prime Minister Modi and Kharge was a token impediment.

Kharge does not threaten anybody’s space but is shrewd enough to carve his own. Those who have witnessed him operate in Karnataka for four decades, will vouch for this. His rise in Delhi since 2009 has been quite steep but has happened quietly. It is not caste alone that has put him in significant roles but his sincerity, too.

Kharge, a staunch Buddhist, has been an Ambedkarite since the 1960s. His early political awareness came from people like B Shyam Sunder, who spoke of Dalit emancipation in Nizam’s Hyderabad and the Hyderabad-Karnataka region that Kharge hails from. In the 1960s, Kharge was invested in the idea of growing Ambedkar’s Republican Party of India in Gulbarga. The arid Gulbarga and Bidar regions of Karnataka have seen a confluence of the Lingayat and Sikh faiths that have egalitarian ideas and a casteless society as their foundational principles. Kharge has always operated against this backdrop. As a fiery labour lawyer, he was discovered by Devaraj Urs, Karnataka’s progressive chief minister.

Why all this needs to be mentioned now is because Kharge was characterised as being “sycophantic” during the campaign, but he learnt early to keep his dignity and self-respect intact. To push a person like Kharge to surrender, or humiliating him, may backfire on the Nehru-Gandhis and the Congress party. Even if one assumes that the Nehru-Gandhis have sponsored his elevation as party chief, they have taken an enormous risk to do so. It is not like putting Manmohan Singh on the prime minister’s chair. Kharge’s personality is very different from past Congress presidents who were not from the family. He is not, and will not become, a DK Barooah (who famously said, “India is Indira, Indira is India”) or a quixotic Sitaram Kesri.

Kharge comes to the top job with many qualifications, yet he can aspire to be a moderate success only if he builds a broad social coalition within the party that looks at cultural, political and electoral questions independently, and harmonises them to fight the BJP.

Congress’s Dalit vote itself has become a huge question mark in recent decades. The splintering of the community has scattered its voting preferences too. But with Kharge at the helm of Congress, at least a small number of the 200 million Dalits may rethink their preferences. That is the hope and that is a beginning for the party’s revival. He is an automatic and powerful symbol for a vast demographic. As Rahul Gandhi focuses on ideological clarity and universal values, Kharge can complement him with electoral pragmatism.

Tharoor spoke of being the tomorrow for the party during the campaign, but with his chronic verbal excitement, he could not have functioned for a single day as the Congress party’s chief. Even a corporate house, which is largely homogenous in its composition, cannot withstand the shock of drastic changes. A complex, heterogenous organisation like the Congress party needs a humble mason instead of a loud man with a bulldozer instinct.

The writer is a senior journalist and author of Furrows in a Field: The Unexplored Life of H D Deve Gowda