Opinion Auto-meters for the people
Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshits promise to scrap autorickshaws because autowallahs harass passengers and many ply...
Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshits promise to scrap autorickshaws because autowallahs harass passengers and many ply illegally is part of her desire to see visitors to Delhis Commonwealth Games return convinced that they have been to a truly civilised city. But are Delhis autowallahs really that greedy? Why wont they switch on the meter? Why do so many ply illegally?
There are two types of auto-driver: 80 per cent are renter-drivers,renting autos from contractors who own multiple vehicles. They pay Rs 250-300 for 10-12 hours and earn the same amount in profit: half their daily taking goes on rent and CNG. Owner-drivers own their machines,although owner is misleading as most are repaying huge loans to auto-financiers from whom they purchased the rickshaw and the required permit. Monthly payments are Rs 9,000-15,000.
Two decisions have strengthened the auto-financiers hands. In 1997,the Supreme Court capped the number of autos,trying to cut emissions. No new auto-permits would be issued; nor could they be sold. Delhis size and population grew,but the number of autos did not. Consequently,the permit price rocketed and a black market emerged. Only auto-financiers won; their existing stock of auto-permits appreciated. In the late 90s,a new rickshaw with permit cost just over a lakh. Today,after a decade of black-market inflation,the same package costs Rs 4-4.5 lakh: Rs 1.45 lakh for the auto,Rs 3 lakh for the permit. Meanwhile,demand for rented autos rose with new migrants,but supply froze,allowing contractors to hike rents.
Then,in 1998,the Supreme Court ordered public transport vehicles to convert to CNG by 2002. Owner-drivers had to pay
Rs 30,000 each. In 2000,Delhi had 83,000 autorickshaws. In 2002,there were 55,000. Where did these autos go? The average owner-driver could not afford it; thousands had to sell their autos and valid permits cheaply to financiers. Others had their permits voided and were left unable to legally drive their autorickshaws: selling them to a financier was the only option. By cancelling and hoarding permits,financiers and the Transport Department managed to get rid of over a third of Delhis autos,sending permit prices spiralling.
Financiers now hold most of Delhis auto-permits but in the names of the original owners (not the financiers),who sold their vehicles years ago. When a driver pays Rs 4-4.5 lakh for the auto-permit package,the permit will be transferred in his name only when the loan is repaid. Until then he drives illegally. Renter-drivers have the same problem: the auto-permit is in the contractors name,or a false name to cover the contractors activities.
Other methods exist to retain control. The financier will make the driver frequently a new migrant to Delhi sign several blank loan contracts. This gives him power to raise interest rates and deny the driver ownership even when the loan is fully repaid. It also allows him to charge extortionate penalty charges. Many of Delhis owner-drivers have been repaying loans for many years due to compound interest and late payment penalties of up to Rs 30,000. The contract maximises the financiers ability to repossess the autorickshaw. Once snatched back,it can be sold to the next driver. Many vehicles have been sold and repossessed five or six times.
The financial pressure on the auto-driver does not end here. The transport department and the traffic police need their cut too. Auto-drivers must carry around 16 documents with them at all times,available from the transport department on application. However,each application requires an absurdly long list of supporting documents: a 50-year-old Bihari driver may be asked for his old school certificates and Delhi ID and ration cards. Impossible requirements,of course,lead to bribes being offered.
Given these requirements,the traffic police can stop auto-drivers and find an excuse to challan them retrospectively. If the officer simply keeps asking to see documents,he will find one which is missing. If not,then he can issue a challan for wrong uniform (including wrong socks),incorrect lettering on auto (Rs 1500) or illegal stopping. (Delhi has 312 official auto-stands. They are unmarked. Nobody knows where they are.)
Is it surprising,then,that in this distorted market,auto-drivers cant rely on the meter? Somehow,in the midst of all these repayments,rents,bribes and challans,the autowallahs must feed their families.
Yet autorickshaws are a vital part of Delhis infrastructure: they are efficient,affordable,economical,environmentally friendly and iconic. They cannot be scrapped. Instead,the whole autorickshaw sector must be reformed,starting with the issuance of new permits. To become a world-class city Delhi does not need more taxis and cars; it needs a bigger,better fleet of autorickshaws that provides convenient public transport to residents and livelihoods to drivers.
The writer researches informal labour for the Delhi-based Aman Trust
express@expressindia.com