Premium
This is an archive article published on May 18, 2012

Whats in a frame?

The hundred words that the group photograph of parliamentarians could say

Listen to this article
Whats in a frame?
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

The hundred words that the group photograph of parliamentarians could say

We mark time with anniversaries,we memorialise places and people with images. A photograph to celebrate 60 years be it of a persons life or a parliaments existence intends to still time. As the Indian Parliament turned 60,there was a group photograph of the members. Pranab Mukherjee,along with a few other parliamentarians,missed it. Mukherjees office apparently did not remind him of the photo-op and he was reportedly not pleased that he was out of the picture.

In this age of digitally altered photographs remember how the Situation Room image was endlessly and playfully changed this is one curious instance when the original integrity of the photograph had its moment. You were either there or not before the camera and nothing could be done to alter that reality. It was the momentary capitulation of Photoshop.

That,indeed,was the primary mandate of the photograph to capture people and places as they are. One of the favourite subjects,then as now,were the rulers. Soon after the announcement of the first daguerreotype in Paris in 1839,photography arrived in India and court photographers like Raja Deen Dayal ruled with their splendid portraiture. However,photographys intent of realism was soon lost. Felice A. Beato is said to have rearranged the skeletons in the Secundra Bagh palace courtyard,after the 1857 Revolt,to heighten the drama of the scene. Now in this democratised world of photography,where Beatos successors have fun,where camera is an addendum of a cell phone,the Parliament photo its associated ceremonies and almost forgotten emotional associations is a pleasant frame.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement