An outspoken Federal Reserve hawk warned on Friday that the US central bank had harmed its credibility by delaying a highly anticipated reduction in monetary stimulus this week,but another official argued it had been the right thing to do.
Policymakers hit the speech circuit as financial markets continued to puzzle over Wednesdays shock decision by the Fed not to scale back its massive bond-buying program after allowing the impression over the summer that it would do so.
Kansas City Fed President Esther George,the lone dissenter on Wednesday,said she had been disappointed by the decision not to begin normalising policy after an unprecedented period of ultra-easy US money that has already lasted five years.
The actions at this meeting,and the expectations that have been set relative to how markets were thinking about this,created confusion,created a disconnect, said George. She has dissented at every Fed meeting this year out of concern its policies could foster future asset bubbles and inflation.
St. Louis Fed chief James Bullard,defending the decision,said low inflation meant the central bank could be patient in deciding when to act,although the prospects for tapering would pick up if payroll and unemployment data brightened further.
Speaking with reporters afterwards,Bullard said the Feds decision to sit tight enhanced our credibility in the sense that it showed we really are paying attention to data and not on some automated program to cut QE quantitative easing to zero.
Fed policymakers could still decide to start reducing bond purchases when they meet again in late October,Bullard said,if inflation and unemployment data warrant it.
Declining borrowing costs could help restore momentum to tepid US growth and hiring.
Bullard,a committee voter this year,said he supported the decision not to alter the current pace of bond purchases,and would not favor any action until inflation reverted from what he views as a worryingly low trend.
Bullard said the Feds unprecedented monetary easing,which began when it cut overnight interest rates to zero in 2008 and has continued through three rounds of bond purchases,has been fairly successful and said he sees no sign of asset bubbles.
The bubbles we had in the past were gigantic and obvious. I dont see anything like that going on right now, he said.