Premium
This is an archive article published on September 6, 2010

That third way

Tony Blair fights for a chance to retell the story of his political savvy.

When past masters speak,the inheritors listen attentively. But their attention is laced with concern,lest

in place of inspiration they find rebuke. That David Miliband,a confirmed Blairite who perhaps surprised himself by his last-minute refusal to lead the coup against Gordon Brown he himself had organised,felt it best to not endorse Tony Blairs memoir,A Journey,speaks volumes about how the father of New Labour has found fault with those meant to uphold his legacy. Yet Blair has positioned the book not so much as a chastisement of Labour,post-Blair,as a history of New Labours beginnings,forged in the old partnership and subsequent rivalry of Blair and Brown.

So while eggs and shoes are hurled at Blair by Dubliners,some would see it as his version of how the past was secured and the future thrown away in the write of the man who led Labour to three consecutive electoral victories,and thinks his successor threw away a fourth. The details and perspectives will be contested. However,as with political autobiographies,right or wrong,petty or magnanimous,one expects to delight in the anecdotes. Blair hasnt said sorry for the Iraq war,but claims to have shed his tears. He charges Chancellor Brown with blocking everything he wanted to do or sabotaging almost everything he did,down to the Keynesian economy PM Brown unleashed to tackle the recession.

Read as Blairs mea culpa or post-bellum revenge,a Labour electing a new leader,will be paying heed. As will Messrs Cameron-Clegg,who,some might say,are walking closer to the Blair line. After all,fallible Blair still had the right insight into post-Cold War politics : beyond ideology,class and tribal loyalties,building grand social coalitions,where state and public interest werent necessarily the same.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement