For the sake of a fair IPL probe,N. Srinivasan and Rajiv Shukla must go
The BCCIs immediate response to IPLs biggest crisis was a role reversal. In the wake of the spot-fixing scandal,BCCI president N. Srinivasan,otherwise reticent,offered several lengthy explanations before announcing an internal inquiry. All this while,the spotlight-courting IPL chairman Rajiv Shukla was mostly unforthcoming. A more appropriate reaction from a better- governed institution would have been the implementation of a role change of another kind. What was required and still is the call of the moment is that both men with powerful additional portfolios that could arguably impede and influence the possibilities of a systematic IPL clean-up,must resign.
The founding fathers of organised cricket in the country had inserted a clause in the BCCIs constitution that didnt allow its members to feed off the commercial interest from games conducted by the board. In 2008,with Srinivasan keen to be part of the million-dollar league,the BCCI made changes to the constitution. The line now reads: No administrator shall have directly or indirectly any commercial interest in any of the events of the BCCI,excluding IPL,Champions League and Twenty20. For far too long,there have been whispers that Srinivasan may have used his office to lend a helping hand to his side,Chennai Super Kings. There have been allegations of the bending of auction rules to corner the big stars. And of match officials making decisions based on considerations of fear and favour. Those allegations have just grown more serious. For the probe to be fair,it needs neutral judges.