The Supreme Court on Monday warned the Chhattisgarh government against blindly labeling human rights activists,concerned about the lives of tribals in Naxal-hit areas,as Naxal sympathisers.
Suppose somebody fights their victims case,so what does that imply? First you say they are Naxals,then you say they are sympathisers,then you say they are sympathisers of sympathisers. Why do you resort to these innuendos?asked a Bench of Justices B Sudershan Reddy and S S Nijjar.
The Benchs remark came in response to a comment by senior advocate Ranjit Kumar,representing the state government,that activist Himanshu Kumar,who had moved the Supreme Court for the protection of 12 tribals,was a Naxal sympathiser. The 12 tribals were allegedly eye-witnesses to the massacre of nine of their villagers by a group of people at Goompad village in Dhantewada district in the state. They had recently given statements to the Delhi District Judge confirming the killings.
The Bench reminded the state government that the activist was in fact fighting for the tribal victims,who are forced to live in dangerous conditions in Naxal-ridden regions.
Appearing for the Centre,Attorney General G E Vahanvati said the government had evolved a Rs 7,300-crore package to develop countrys Naxal-affected regions.