Book Review-Nom de Plume

Carmela Ciurarus Nom de Plume deftly tells the stories of some of literatures most famous pen names.

Nom de Plume: A Secret History of Pseudonyms Harper/HarperCollins,by Carmela Ciuraru: In the annals of literature,pen names have long created as much intrigue about the authors as the pieces they write.

Carmela Ciurarus Nom de Plume deftly tells the stories of some of literatures most famous pen names by weaving in details about these secretive,often eccentric writers lives and works to examine their decision to use pen names. From Lewis Carroll born Charles Dodgson,to Mark Twain Samuel Clemens and Victoria Lucas Sylvia Plath,one chapter is devoted to each with so much detail that the authors under discussion seem to become characters in Ciurarus book.

Take the title of Plaths chapter: She found sexual satisfaction in picking her nose. For anyone who creates _ writers,artists and performers _ the book will enthrall. Its as much a meditation on the creative process as it is a tell-all about their names and the intrigue,branding or mind games that created them. Readers dont need to be familiar with all the writers. Some of the names arent well-known to modern audiences,which Ciuraru acknowledges. But theyll still be able to appreciate the stories behind the story.

Ciuraru devotes pages to exploring the reasons for _ and effects of _ these other identities. Shes done much research for this book,weaving in the authors personal and public writings,along with those of their contemporaries.

The names can be an excuse,reason or outlet to create. The Bronte sisters _ Anne,Charlotte and Emily,and Karen Blixen,wouldnt have been taken seriously _ or even printed. So the male pen names of Acton,Currer and Ellis Bell,and Isak Dinesen,gave them a chance to be published.

Others,like Carroll,author of Alices Adventures in Wonderland, were well-established in their fields and wanted a pen name to separate their various selves.

Carroll,a shy,eminent Oxford mathematician and lecturer,had created the nom de plume as a means of shelter from which he could let his imagination run wild, she explains.

Story continues below this ad

He stuck to his pen name so much that he even asked a library at Oxford to delete all cross-references between his two names.

One shortcoming of Nom de Plume is its lack of conclusion. The book is told as a series of short works on these authors and many similarities among them pop out,beyond their pen names. Ciuraru expertly tells their stories and draws conclusions within each section,but other than the introduction,theres no explanation to bring the examination full circle.