Premium
This is an archive article published on February 11, 2012

Antrix files pleas against Devas moving ICC for arbitration

A hearing was held,and the cases have been adjourned to February 25

In two cases filed in a civil court in Bangalore,Antrix Corporation has called its former partner Devas Multimedia’s move to invoke arbitration under the International Chamber of Commerce,Paris,rules as being contrary to their January 28,2005,agreement and an expensive proposition.

In the two cases — an original suit and an arbitration appeal — filed in December 2011,Antrix has sought orders to prevent proceedings of the arbitration tribunal set up by the ICC following the Devas appeal. A hearing was held on Thursday,and the cases have been adjourned to February 25.

Devas approached the ICC on June 29,2011,after which it constituted the tribunal that currently comprises chairman Professor Michael Pryles,Devas arbitrator V V Veeder and Antrix arbitrator Justice A S Anand (the former chief justice of India). The tribunal has asked for payment of US $325,000 as part of US $650,000 fees for the arbitration,Antrix says.

Story continues below this ad

Antrix believes Indian arbitration rules under the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1966 — based on the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law — should be applied to the case since the seat of arbitration defined in the agreement is New Delhi. The company also says Devas invoked arbitration under ICC unilaterally without issuing a notice to Antrix.

On August 8,2011,the company states,it filed a petition under Section 11 of the Indian Act in the Supreme Court of India seeking arbitration in the Devas Multimedia matter and the constitution of a tribunal. This was done after issuing a notice on July 30,2011,to Devas,says Antrix. The ICC would be overreaching the Supreme Court of India by constituting a tribunal,says Antrix.

Antrix also accuses Devas of attempting to continue with their January 28,2005,agreement and of trying to defeat a government of India policy decision to annul the deal. Antrix says this is evident from the Devas plea before the ICC tribunal to make their agreement binding and to direct ISRO to deliver satellites as per the agreement.

“The arbitration petition is a grave injustice to the people of India and the security of the country since spectrum is a natural resource,” states Antrix.

Story continues below this ad

In its response to the Antrix arbitration notice under Indian laws,Devas has said it had been wrongly initiated in the SC of India.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement