Questions for Karat

So Volcker report isn8217;t an imperialist conspiracy? Or is guilt dependent on political fancy?

When extreme malleability threatens political morals we still tend to look at the CPM to see if someone cares for the straight and the narrow. This reflex is born out of many past examples in which communists have appeared to care for political ethics. Even now, and whatever one8217;s differences with the CPM on matters of policy and politics, communists almost certainly have the most flattering honesty to venality ratio among all political parties. But there have been, ever since the Left allowed the UPA to become a governing coalition, a strong tendency towards abundantly hypocritical moralising. This is discrediting the CPM. The endless speechifying on Manmohan Singh8217;s economics when Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee8217;s is scarcely different in intent and substance is one way the CPM is losing credibility. The party8217;s super-convenient stand during the office of profit controversy is another demonstration. But perhaps the most remarkable example came last weekend when Prakash Karat said private companies named in the Volcker report must also be probed. Parliament is supposed to be appraised by the CPM this week of the 8220;omission8221;.

We would like to draw Mr Karat8217;s attention to a robust opinion piece he had written in

The Hindu on November 9, 2005. Two points he made are relevant. Karat had argued Natwar Singh was being targeted in the Volcker report for opposing the Iraq invasion and leading a Congress delegation to Iraq. He had also questioned whether the Iraqi oil vouchers were at all an 8220;illegal deal through political patronage8221; or whether they were, more innocently, 8220;a business transaction like other contracts entered into by Indian business enterprises8221;. So, in November 2005 Karat had said Natwar Singh was a victim of imperialist conspiracy and that the oil deals were probably quite kosher.

Two questions Mr Karat. If the oil vouchers were ordinary business transactions why does the question of probing private companies come up? And if the oil vouchers were not so kosher 8212; we are presuming you have changed your mind on that 8212; then is the Volcker report no longer an imperialist conspiracy? It surely can8217;t be that the oil deals were sleazy when applied to private companies and perfectly honourable when related to Natwar and his family and associates. There may well be a case for expanding the Volcker findings probe. But there cannot be a more unconvincing advocate for it than Prakash Karat. He8217;s asking to see the dirty linen after handing out clean chits.