
Senator Joe Lieberman, who angered Democratic voters with his staunch support of the war in Iraq, on Tuesday narrowly lost his party8217;s nomination to Ned Lamont, an antiwar candidate who was virtually unknown seven months ago.
Lieberman is only the fourth incumbent Senator to lose his party8217;s nomination since 1980. He promised to run for a fourth term as an Independent candidate.
8216;8216;The old politics of polarisation won today,8217;8217; he said. 8216;8216;For the sake of our state, our country and my party, I cannot and will not let that result stand.8217;8217;
The race, initially predicted as a blowout victory for Lieberman, became a lesson in how the war in Iraq has reshaped partisan politics. In Lamont8217;s headquarters, a jubilant crowd celebrated an upset win that, last year, would not have seemed possible.
Lamont thanked Lieberman for 8216;8216;the grace and dignity with which he has served our state for many years,8217;8217; and vowed to act for change.
8216;8216;Some call Connecticut 8216;the land of steady habits.8217; Connecticut voters do not call for change lightly, but today we called for change decisively,8217;8217; he said. 8216;8216;No more 8216;stay the course8217;: Stay the course is not a winning strategy in Iraq, and it is not a winning strategy in America.8217;8217;
Lamont, a wealthy cable executive, led Lieberman by less than four percentage points, with 51.79 per cent of the vote to Lieberman8217;s 48.21 per cent. Several of his supporters said they hoped Lamont8217;s win will prove to be a transforming moment for the Democratic Party.
An independent Lieberman campaign will force an awkward choice for state Democratic leaders: Fully shift their support to the novice politician who has the party8217;s backing, or support Lieberman. Most prospective Lamont voters have said they were supporting him out of dislike for Lieberman.
Ellen Barry