Premium
This is an archive article published on November 17, 2007

CELL WAR

A war of words is going on in the world of mobile telephony. There is talk of GSM and CDMA, of spectrum and number portability. sunday express takes a simplified look at the controversy

.

On October 19, the Department of Telecommunications DoT announced it would accept the recommendations on a new licence regime made by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India TRAI and allowed CDMA operators to offer GSM-based mobile telephone services. Then in the past two weeks, Sunil Mittal of Bharti Airtel, Arun Sarin of Vodafone, Anil Ambani of Reliance Communications, BSNL Chairman A K Sinha, and MTNL Chairman RSP Sinha have written letters to various authorities on the issue. TRAI Chairman Nripendra Misra, Commerce Minister Kamal Nath and Minister of State for Commerce Jairam Ramesh have also written about the new norms. The Cellular Operators Association of India COAI has approached the Telecom Dispute Settlement Appellate Tribunal TDSAT to protest against the policy.

What is the current controversy all about?
TRAI8217;s recommendations envisage allowing mobile service providers to expand their networks using alternate technologies. This implies that the operators using CDMA technology for offering mobile services can be allowed to provide GSM-based mobile services and vice-versa. However, allocation of spectrum for the alternate technology would be done on payment of a fee equal to the entry fee for getting a new licence.
Currently, there are four CDMA players: Reliance, Tata, HFCL and Shyam. Of these three players8212;Reliance pan-India operator, HFCL Punjab and Shyam Rajasthan8212;had applied to DoT for permission to offer GSM services. Their argument was that the licences issued to them were technology neutral. On October 19, Reliance paid DoT the entry fee for GSM spectrum.
The other important recommendation of TRAI accepted by DoT was that the number of subscribers required by an operator for being eligible for additional spectrum should be increased. DoT also set up a committee under the Telecom Engineering Centre TEC, which is responsible for fixing standards, to give the final recommendations on spectrum allocation criteria. On October 31, TEC submitted its report to DoT. TEC recommended more stringent conditions than those proposed by TRAI . For instance, in a metro like Delhi an operator would be required to have up to three times more subscribers than at present to get 10 MHz of spectrum. This also implies that more spectrum will be available for new operators.

What is spectrum?
Spectrum consists of electromagnetic radiations used to transmit voice and data. Spectrum is backbone of any telecom network and is considered a scarce limited natural resource.

What is the difference between CDMA and GSM?
GSM Global System for Mobile Communications and CDMA Code Division Multiple Access are both carrier technologies. GSM was originally developed in Europe, CDMA in USA. Both are digital technologies. The difference lies in the way they use spectrum. GSM users are assigned a specific time slot for transmission and reception. CDMA uses a code to identify transmissions and different codes are used for the up-link and down-link. While neighbouring cell towers in GSM must talk on different frequencies, those in CDMA usually use the same frequency. CDMA is much more spectrum efficient than GSM. However, GSM is much more commercially successful and is used in a large number of countries. Due to this reason many CDMA operators are shifting to GSM worldwide.

Why are GSM players represented by COAI upset?
They have two main objections:
l GSM players say that the existing licence conditions do not allow mobile operators to use alternate technologies.
l They also say DoT cannot change the spectrum allocation criteria and make it more stringent for them. The GSM companies have alleged that DoT is changing rules to 8220;help one large CDMA player8221;. Reliance Communications, presumably the company they are hinting at, on its part, has accused GSM players of having monopolistic attitude.
COAI also contends TEC prepared its report in a non-transparent manner. 8220;It is submitted that the entire TEC exercise and report was rushed through with unseemly haste inasmuch as TEC did not wait for the full inputs from the GSM industry and proceeded to carry out and complete the same based on alleged scientific analysis,8221; COAI has said in its petition to TDSAT.
In a letter to DoT Secretary D S Mathur, Bharti Airtel8217;s Sunil Mittal said, 8220;We would not claim to be experts in our sector but can certainly claim some degree of knowledge to challenge the absurd proposed spectrum allocation which has been put forth by the Telecom Engineering Centre. The outcome of the hurried exercise at TEC is a sad commentary on how international and time tested norms for spectrum allocation are being ignored.8221;
In his rebuttal in the form of a letter to the Prime Minister Reliance Communications Chairman Anil Ambani said DoT8217;s policymaking process was completely transparent and the GSM operators were adopting 8220;an anti-consumer, anti-competitive stance8221;. He wrote, 8220;The motivated game plan of a few large GSM operators in the country is simple8212;prevent the entry of new players in the GSM space, hoard spectrum, and limit new competition, indulge in anti-consumer practices such as cartelisation and price fixation, delay implementation of all new initiatives indefinitely through a combination of litigation and policy uncertainty to enhance their own dominance, and make the cost of entry for new players prohibitive and unviable.8221;

What does the National Telecom Policy NTP 99 say on this issue?
On spectrum, NTP 99 says: 8220;Availability of adequate frequency spectrum is essential not only for providing optimal bandwidth to every operator but also for entry of additional operators8230;It is proposed to review the spectrum utilisation from time to time keeping in view the emerging scenario of spectrum availability, optimal use of spectrum, requirements of market, competition and other interests of public. A November, 2003, amendment to NTP 99 introduced the Universal Service Access Licence. On technology the amendment says: 8220;There shall also be the following categories of licences for telecommunication services: Unified Licence for Telecommunication Services permitting Licensee to provide all telecommunication/telegraph services covering various geographical areas using any technology.8221;

What is maximum spectrum available to GSM operators?
The licences do not define the maximum spectrum that an operator can possess. As per the existing merger guidelines, the maximum spectrum that can be held by a merged entity in case two companies are merged is capped at 15 MHz per service area of Metro and Category A service areas and 12.4 MHz per operator per service area in Category B and C circles. Some operators are already eligible to get 15Mhz of spectrum in some areas under the existing subscriber-based criteria.

Story continues below this ad

What are the international standards on allocation?
There are no international standards. In a representation to Communications Minister Raja, COAI has pointed out that average spectrum allotted to each operator in France and Spain is 36 MHz each. In UK each operator has been allotted 26 MHz.

Is something wrong with spectrum management?
TRAI has said there is need to work on a new scientific system of allotting spectrum. The biggest problem with spectrum management is that DoT is responsible for policymaking, allotting spectrum and management. Ideally, spectrum management should be under a specialised body. In many countries spectrum allocation is under a regulator. When licences for GSM services were granted in 1994, no one could imagine how mobile telephony would grow. Therefore, there was no scientific method of allotting spectrum and its management. Even today, a significant part of spectrum lies with the defence forces.

What is number portability?
Number portability allows a subscriber to retain his/her number even after switching service providers. Without number portability, a large number of subscribers are forced to remain with their operators even if dissatisfied with the services because of the hassles involved in changing the number. While number portability cannot be implemented on a nationwide basis immediately, it will be initially implemented in the four metros, DoT has said.

What would be its impact on spectrum?
Number portability will not have much impact on spectrum. However, it will be of great convenience to consumers.

Story continues below this ad

What are 3G and WiMAX?
3G mobile communications is the generic name for the next generation mobile networks that allow high data speed. They are capable of supporting services such as high resolution video, multimedia services in addition to voice, fax and conventional data. WiMAX is an evolving technology that promises to offer high speed wireless data transfer. Both services will be offered in spectrum band other than that of GSM. So, they will not have any impact on the present controversy on spectrum between CDMA and GSM players.

What is likely to happen now?
As the matter is before TDSAT, one will have to wait for the TDSAT verdict. The government may also try to get all the operators on a table and sort out the issue through discussions.

8212;Text by Manoj Gairola, Illustration by Sudipto Sharma

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement