Telangana HC directs fast-tracking of pension process for former judge
Justice (retd) G Sri Devi stated she was receiving a paltry sum of Rs 17,440 towards pension each month, as against the entitlement of Rs 1,12,500 each month as basic pension.
Written by Rahul V Pisharody
Hyderabad | December 20, 2025 10:21 AM IST
3 min read
Whatsapp
twitter
Facebook
Reddit
The petitioner stated that she was receiving a paltry sum of Rs 17,440 towards pension each month at present, as against the entitlement of Rs 1,12,500 each month as basic pension.
(file)
The Telangana High Court on Friday directed the state and central authorities to initiate the pension process of former Telangana High Court judge, Justice (retd) G Sri Devi, by the next hearing on January 5, 2026, and emphasised the need to facilitate the timely disbursal of her retirement benefits.
The direction from a division bench of Justices P Sam Koshy and Suddala Chalapathi Rao came in response to a writ petition filed by the former judge, who alleged that the current delay in processing her pension under the Old Pension Scheme (OPS), which she opted for and entitled to, was illegal, arbitrary, and a violation of her fundamental rights under Articles 14, 16, 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India.
Justice (retd) Devi, who served as a Judge of the Telangana High Court from May 2019 and retired in October 2022, approached the court challenging the inaction of several state and central authorities in processing her pensionary benefits, including the arrears of unpaid pension and the interest accrued on them.
The petitioner had sought directions of the court to the Accountant General, the Director of Treasuries and Accounts, and the Pay and Accounts Officer to process the pension papers of the petitioner to facilitate the disbursal of such benefits to her, including the arrears of unpaid pension and interest accrued.
The petitioner, represented by senior counsel B Mayur Reddy and counsel Paida Pratik Reddy, contended that this was in violation of the principle of ‘one rank one pension’, which is the norm of a constitutional office, as held by the Supreme Court in P Ramakrishnam Raju Vs Union of India and reiterated in High Court Judges Pension Refixation Considering Service Period in District Judiciary & High Court in May 2025.
That ruling has mandated that all retired high court judges, regardless of whether they were elevated from the district judiciary or the Bar, are entitled to a uniform pension structure—currently set at Rs 13.5 lakh per annum for judges who did not retire as Chief Justices, the petitioner argued.
The petitioner stated that she was receiving a paltry sum of Rs 17,440 towards pension each month at present, as against the entitlement of Rs 1,12,500 each month as basic pension.
Rahul V Pisharody is Assistant Editor with the Indian Express Online and has been reporting for IE on various news developments from Telangana since 2019. He is currently reporting on legal matters from the Telangana High Court.
Rahul started his career as a journalist in 2011 with The New Indian Express and worked in different roles at the Hyderabad bureau for over 8 years. As Deputy Metro Editor, he was in charge of the Hyderabad bureau of the newspaper and coordinated with the team of city reporters, district correspondents, other centres and internet desk for over three years.
A native of Palakkad in Kerala, Rahul has a Master's degree in Communication (Print and New Media) from the University of Hyderabad and a Bachelor's degree in Business Management from PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore. ... Read More