Premium
This is an archive article published on June 14, 2020

Sedition case: SC grants interim relief from arrest to journalist Vinod Dua, refuses to stay probe

In a special hearing today, a bench comprising Justices U U Lalit, M M Shantanagoudar and Vineet Saran refused to stay the investigation but ordered the Himachal Pradesh Police to give him 24 hours time to join the probe.

Vinod Dua, Vinod dua sedition, BJP The police in Shimla had summoned Vinod Dua for questioning over a sedition complaint by a local BJP leader.

The Supreme Court on Sunday granted interim protection from arrest till July 6 to journalist Vinod Dua in a sedition case filed against him following a complaint by a local BJP leader in Shimla over his YouTube show.

In a special hearing today, a bench comprising Justices U U Lalit, M M Shantanagoudar and Vineet Saran refused to stay the investigation but ordered the Himachal Pradesh Police to give him 24 hours time to join the probe.

The order came after Dua filed a plea seeking quashing of the sedition case.

Story continues below this ad

Dua has been charged under sections 124A (sedition), 268 (public nuisance), 501 (printing matter known to be defamatory) and 505 (statements conducive to public mischief) on the basis of a complaint last month by BJP’s Mahasu unit president Ajay Shyam. The BJP leader claimed that Dua made bizarre allegations on his 15-minute YouTube show on March 30.

The complainant has alleged that the journalist accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi of using “deaths and terror attacks” to get votes.

The police in Shimla had summoned the journalist for questioning over a sedition complaint by a local BJP leader. Himachal Pradesh police personnel also visited his Delhi residence on Friday morning to serve the notice.

In his reply to the notice, Dua said he cannot visit Kumarsain police station because of his health, age and the COVID-19 protocol for travel and quarantine.

Story continues below this ad

The BJP leader alleged that Dua had instigated violence against the government and the prime minister by spreading false and malicious news.

Besides this, the Delhi High Court had earlier stayed an investigation into a similar case filed by BJP spokesperson Naveen Kumar against the journalist for allegedly “misreporting the Delhi riots”, “false contextual reporting” when Jyotiraditya Scindia joined the BJP, and his comments on the “Vyapam scam”.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement