In an affidavit filed on January 13, the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare said that âno person can be forced to be vaccinated against their wishesâ.
(AP/File)
Advertisement
Days before India completed a year of its Covid-19 inoculation programme, the government told the Supreme Court that it has not issued any guideline that envisages vaccination without consent, or makes a vaccination certificate mandatory for any purpose.
In an affidavit filed on January 13, the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare said that âno person can be forced to be vaccinated against their wishesâ.
Youâve Read Your Free Stories For Now
Sign up and keep reading more stories that matter to you.
It also said that âthe Government of India has not issued any SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) which make carrying of vaccination certificate mandatory for any purpose.â
âIt is humbly submitted that the direction and guidelines released by Government of India and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, do not envisage any forcible vaccination without obtaining consent of the concerned individual,â the ministry said.
Underlining that âvaccination for Covid-19 is of larger public interest in view of the ongoing pandemic situationâ, the government said âit is duly advised, advertised and communicated through various print and social media platforms that all citizens should get vaccinated and systems and processes have been designed to facilitate the same. However, no person can be forced to be vaccinated against their wishes.â
It said that the government has formulated operational guidelines for Covid-19 vaccination according to which âall beneficiaries are to be informed about adverse events which may occur after Covid-19 vaccineâ.
Explained
Vaccine mandates, âpassportsâ
Governments and businesses have been seeking to enforce vaccine mandates, restricting the entry of the unvaccinated to public places. âVaccine passportsâ have been debated around the world.
Some states have issued orders to disincentivise the refusal of vaccination by citizens. Maharashtra had said that only fully vaccinated individuals would be allowed on local trains, and the Kerala government had said the state would not bear the cost of Covid-19 treatment for unvaccinated individuals.
Story continues below this ad
The Centreâs affidavit was filed in a matter in which the court had permitted the petitioner â Evara Foundation â to formulate any concrete steps to strengthen the existing framework for facilitating the vaccination of disabled persons, and to ensure that they have proper access to the process.
The government said it had accordingly received the suggestions and considered them.
The ministry said that as on January 11, 2022, a total of 1,52,95,43,602 doses had been administered, and 90.84 per cent of the eligible adult population had received their first dose of the vaccine. Sixty-one per cent of the adult population had received their second dose.
A total 23,678 doses had been administered to disabled persons who had voluntarily chosen to be identified as such by using their Unique Disability ID Card/Disability Certificate for registration.
Story continues below this ad
For persons with disabilities who do not have any of the prescribed ID cards, provisions had been made âby following Facilitated Cohort Registration process on Co-WINâ, the government said.
âCo-WIN system provides the facility for creation of special vaccination sessions for this purpose and these sessions will have the features of registration of as many beneficiaries as are to be covered (subject to the limit of session capacity), without mandatory capturing of Mobile Number and Photo ID Card, through facilitated cohort registration and all vaccination slots in such special sessions will be reserved for vaccination of such facilitated cohortsâ, the affidavit says.
âAs on 06.01.2022, a total of 58,81,979 persons without any IDs have been vaccinated under the National Covid-19 vaccination programme,â it says.
Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry.
He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More