Premium
This is an archive article published on August 14, 2024

‘POCSO law being misapplied’: Delhi HC grants bail to man in jail for three years in rape case

Consensual sex between girls who are “just below the age of 18 years and boys who are just above 20 years” has been in legal grey area, the court noted

Delhi High Court POCSOThe case dates back to 2021 when a 17-year old girl had eloped, twice, with a 21-year old man following opposition from her family over the religion of the man. (File)

Granting bail to a 24-year old man, the Delhi High Court Wednesday pointed out that it has been “constantly seeing” that POCSO cases are being filed at the behest of the girl’s family “who object to her friendship and romantic involvement with a young boy”, adding the law is being misapplied in such cases.
The court further said that this results in “young boys, who have genuinely fallen in love with girls who are just below 18 years of age, languishing in jails.”

Booked for rape and for offences under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, the man had been in jail for the past three years before he was granted bail.

The case dates back to 2021 when a 17-year old girl had eloped, twice, with a 21-year old man following opposition from her family over the religion of the man. An FIR was lodged based on the complaint of the girl’s mother and investigation had led to the girl residing with the man. The girl, later in her statement to doctors, had claimed that she had married the man and was pregnant, adding that her mother was aware of this.

Justice Subramonium Prasad, ruling in the man’s favour, noted in the verdict, “Consensual sex between girls who are just below the age of 18 years and boys who are just above 20 years has been in legal grey area because the consent given by a minor girl cannot be said to be a valid consent in the eyes of law….”
Justice Prasad further said the statement given by the “Prosecutrix (the girl) before the doctors that her mother knew about her relationship with the Petitioner and that the FIR has been lodged by her mother only because the Petitioner herein had refused to change his religion gives an indication that the present FIR was lodged at the behest of the parents of the Prosecutrix who did not approve of the relationship…”

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement