skip to content
Premium
This is an archive article published on August 3, 2016
Premium

Opinion Pushpa Kamal Dahal can now afford to be more balanced in his relations with India, US

With guerrillas issue settled this time around, Dahal may not have to fear the retaliation from inside.

india nepal relations, Pushpa Kamal Dahal, Pushpa Kamal Dahal india visit, nepal pm, nepal pm dahal, pm dahal vists india, narendra modi meets nepal pm, india news
New DelhiAugust 3, 2016 10:30 PM IST First published on: Aug 3, 2016 at 10:22 PM IST
Pushpa Kumar Dahal, Nepal PM, nepal, Prachanda Nepal, Prachanda Nepal PM Pushpa Kamal Dahal ‘Prachanda’

“My first official visit will be Beijing,” Pushpa Kamal Dahal ‘Prachanda’ said soon after he was elected the Prime Minister in August 2008. And the next day, he stepped out to the north, that Maoists claimed was a significant departure from tradition of Nepalese Prime Minister undertaking first official trip to Delhi.

Exactly eight years later, chain of events in a politically unstable Nepal, have brought him back to the Chair, and what the Prime Minister designate valued the most was a congratulatory message from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi looking forward to welcome Dahal in Delhi soon.

Advertisement

Dahal’s politics has seen ups and downs and contradictions. He headed the Maoist guerrillas cum Party as its Chairman cum Supreme Commander when the Party decided to launch a ‘revolution’ to transform a Hindu Kingdom into a secular Republic. His call to the world outside was even larger in scope: end of Indian hegemony and U S imperialism.

But on the tenth year of insurgency, the anti-hegemony leader established a rapport with Indian establishment, promised not to go against its ‘vital interest’ in lieu of India treating them as ‘political outfit’, and not the terrorist. Dahal came to the peace process and democratic fold in Nepal, but he continued to play ‘anti-India’ card publicly, largely for the consumption of his guerrillas – indoctrinated in the world view that was anti-India and anti-US – who were still waiting for mass rehabilitation in the society or security agencies.

His dismissing the chief of the Nepal Army as Prime Minister to appease his guerrillas cost him the post in May 2003.

Advertisement

With guerrillas issue settled this time around, Dahal may not have to fear the retaliation from inside. He can afford to be more balanced in his relations with India and the US as well as the Nepal Army this time around.

However, his transformation from a revolutionary hero, to a Prime Minister under a democratic system, his tussle with the army chief he tried to sack unsuccessfully, series of splits in the Party that caused Maoists slipping into a distant third party in Parliament within a gap of four years , may have made him ‘weaker’ but perhaps wiser as well in the same proportion. “I did not have much experience earlier’, he said . He has also lost credibility in the eyes of the public for his inconsistent utterances and acts,.and changing allies in a power driven politics.

He has been able to secure support of Nepali congress and the Madhesi groups, the later consider pro-India, but his survival will largely depend on whether he will be able to appease the NC, and at what cost, will be a crucial factor.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us