Legal

On November 24, the top court deferred the matter after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre and the Union Territory of Ladakh, sought time to respond to the rejoinder filed by Angmo.

A bench of Justices Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Rohit Kapoor allowed the appeal filed by the two convicts and commuted their death sentence to life imprisonment.

Justice Sharma said that in the case of appointments in different years, the initial date of appointment will be a good consideration for determining seniority.

Land dispute case: Justice R Raghunandan Rao was hearing a dispute over 43 acres of agricultural land with petitioners claiming ownership through 1939–1951 sale deeds and family revenue records dating back to a 1940s partition.

The Karnataka High Court upheld a decision of the Commissioner for Employees Compensation, which held a school management liable for compensation of Rs 5.38 lakh in a 2008 accident.

The court lamented that in several cases audio video recording was not conducted by the police which benefited the criminals during bail and trial.

A sessions court in Mumbai noted that the student’s account had received Rs 23,900 as part of a cyber fraud involving Rs 12 lakh.

Businessman Kailash Ramchandani’s lawyers told the Supreme Court that the NIA proposes to examine 146 witnesses in the Gadchiroli blast case, of which only one had been examined so far.

Kerala High Court Latest Judgment: Justice Kauser Edappagath was hearing a plea challenging a 2012 family court decision that denied maintenance to a divorced Muslim woman because her ex-husband had already met his obligations under

Divorce settlement contempt case: While hearing the contempt case against the woman, the bench said that addressing the media and issuing press statements is not a remedy that can be appreciated by this court.

Punjab and Haryana High Court News: Justice Sandeep Moudgil highlighting the text of Bhagvad Gita said it reminds that action must serve "social stability" and the "common good", not merely administrative convenience.

A bench of Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and K Vinod Chandran enhanced the compensation by modifying loss of income to Rs 7.14 lakh and restored the disability assessment fixed by MACT.

Chief Justice G Narendar and Justice Subhash Upadhyay, hearing a batch of PILs related to rampant mining said that the state failed to demonstrate that scientific and safe mining practices were being followed.

It also rapped the CAQM for seeking two more months to come out with a plan to address the issue of traffic congestion at toll plazas on Delhi’s borders, which add to the pollution.

The bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi was hearing petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

Bench urges CJ to initiate inquiry against trial court judge; orders action against court employee who got eviction order

The top court directed the CAQM to start considering long-term solutions in a phased manner.

Two others accused in the case were, however, granted bail, with the Gujarat High Court pointing out that they appeared to be unaware of the trafficking involved to carry out cyber crimes.

Madhya Pradesh High Court: Justice Ashish Shroti was hearing the plea of an official of the animal husbandry department, seeking to restrain authorities from proceeding with disciplinary action against fraud charges.

Biological father rights: The bench said that the school should make necessary correction in their records and incorporate the name of the petitioner as the father, as per the Right of Children to Free and

Representing Ali Khan Mahmudabad, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal pointed out that the Supreme Court had said the criminal investigation cannot go beyond the post written.

In 3 separate cases, where the accused were allegedly held with beef, the court noted that bail was the rule and jail was the exception aside from underlining the protection of their personal liberty and

Mob Lynching Case 2025: While granting anticipatory bail to the accussed, Justice Diengdoh said that in the same case other accussed have been granted bail, only difference is that, in meantime, a charge sheet has

Denying bail to Arvind Dham in August last year, the Delhi High Court had stated that economic offences of “exceptional magnitude” erode the “fabric of governance and public trust and cannot be taken lightly”.

Calcutta High Court News: Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya observed that the petitioner, an aspiring constable, got his tattoo removed after a detailed medical examination and sought a review medical examination to be declared “fit”.