Premium
This is an archive article published on March 28, 2019

EC red-flags new poll funding norms to SC: ‘serious impact’

The EC also said that the changes in the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA) “would allow unchecked foreign funding of political parties in India, which could lead to Indian policies being influenced by foreign companies”.

EC red-flags new poll funding norms to SC: ‘serious impact’ The Centre had earlier told the court that the decision to introduce electoral bonds was “a big step towards electoral reform” and the process to acquire/ encash them would “ensure transparency” and “accountability”. (Illustration by Manali Ghosh)

Red-flagging the electoral bond scheme, the Election Commission (EC) has told the Supreme Court that it had
conveyed to the Centre, in 2017, that the changes made in several laws related to political funding would have “serious repercussions/ impact on the transparency aspect… of funding of political parties”.

In an affidavit filed on March 25, the EC said it had communicated its concerns regarding “certain provisions of the Finance Act, 2017, and the corresponding amendments carried out in the Income Tax Act, the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Companies Act, 2013…” to the Union Law Ministry in a letter dated May 26, 2017.

The EC also said that the changes in the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA) “would allow unchecked foreign funding of political parties in India, which could lead to Indian policies being influenced by foreign companies”.

Story continues below this ad

The affidavit was filed by Vijay Kumar Pande, Director (Law), Election Commission of India, in response to petitions filed by the CPI(M) and the Association for Democratic Reforms, challenging the constitutional validity of the electoral bond scheme. Follow more election news here.

The Centre had earlier told the court that the decision to introduce electoral bonds was “a big step towards electoral reform” and the process to acquire/ encash them would “ensure transparency” and “accountability”.

Also Read | Oppn complains, EC sets up panel to probe but PM’s address likely to escape the heat

The EC, however, said the move would take donations received by a political party out of the ambit of reporting them as per provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. It said it had conveyed in its letter that “in a situation where contributions received through electoral bonds are not reported, on perusal of the contribution reports of the political parties, it cannot be ascertained whether the political party has taken any donation in violation of provisions under Section 29B of the Representation of the People Act 1971, which prohibits political parties from taking donations from government companies and foreign sources”.

Story continues below this ad

On the changes in the FCRA, through the Finance Act, 2016, the EC said it “allows donations to be received from foreign companies having majority stake in Indian companies, provided that they follow the FEMA guidelines pertaining to foreign investment in the sector in which they operate… This is a change from the existing law barring donations from all foreign sources as defined under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act.”

The EC also said that in March 2017, it “had written to the Ministry of Law and Justice that many political parties had been reporting a major part of the donations received as being less than the prescribed limit of Rs 20,000, for which details regarding name, address and PAN of the donors were not being maintained.”

Accordingly, it recommended some changes in law to ensure transparency in political funding and to reduce the limit of anonymous cash donations to Rs 2,000.

The EC said it had, in 2004 and 2016, sent proposals to the government to bring about changes in laws to ensure transparency in the collection and spending of funds by political parties.

Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement