Premium
This is an archive article published on July 1, 2016

US judge blocks Mississippi law allowing denial of services to LGBT community

US District Judge Reeves issued an injunction blocking the law that was to take effect on Friday.

Mississippi, LGBT, Mississippi lgbt ban, Mississippi LGBT community ban, US court Mississippi law, Mississippi LGBT marriages, gay maraiges, US gay community, Mississippi lgbt discrimination, usa news, world news, latest news Federal judge blocks Mississippi law allowing merchants to cite religious beliefs to deny services to gay couples (Source: Reuters)

A federal judge has blocked a Mississippi law that would let merchants and government employees cite religious beliefs in denying or delaying services to same-sex couples.

US District Judge Carlton Reeves filed orders in two lawsuits blocking the law just moments before it was to take effect Friday.

State attorneys are expected to appeal.

The law would protect three beliefs: That marriage is only between a man and a woman; that sex should only take place in such a marriage; and that a person’s gender is determined at birth and cannot be altered.

It would allow clerks to cite religious objections to recuse themselves from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples and could affect adoptions and foster care, business practices and school bathroom policies.

[related-post]

Watch Video: What’s making news

Reeves wrote that the law is unconstitutional because “the state has put its thumb on the scale to favor some religious beliefs over others.” He also wrote that it violates the Constitution’s equal protection guarantee.

More than 100 bills were filed in more than 20 state legislatures across the nation in response to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling nearly a year ago that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, UCLA law professor Douglas NeJaime testified before Reeves last week.

“In physics, every action has its equal and opposite reaction,” Reeves wrote. “In politics, every action has its predictable overreaction.”

Story continues below this ad

State attorneys argued that the law provides reasonable accommodations for people with deeply held religious beliefs that gay marriage is wrong.

Reeves notes that one section of the bill specifies that the state could not punish any religious organization that refuses to solemnize a same-sex marriage.

“There is nothing new or controversial about that section,” Reeves wrote. “Religious organizations already have that right under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.”

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement