Art and Culture with Devdutt Pattanaik | When India first smelted iron 

This claim is supported by some of the archaeological discoveries across Tamil Nadu, such as: 

1. Mayiladumparai (Krishnagiri district) – Radiocarbon dates from 2172 BCE or earlier reveal iron artefacts and furnaces, suggesting one of the world’s oldest known instances of iron use.

2. Paiyampalli (Vellore district) – Excavations show a transition from Neolithic to Iron Age culture, with smelting remains and iron objects dating to around 1500 BCE.

3. Adichanallur (Thoothukudi district) – Burial sites and slag evidence indicate advanced metallurgy and iron tool use roughly between 1500 and 1000 BCE.

Until recently, everyone assumed that the Iron Age began in India in the Vedic period. The Rig Veda does not mention iron. It only refers to “ayas”, which probably meant copper or bronze. But by the time of the Atharva Veda, we encounter the phrase “krishna ayas”, or black metal, suggesting that iron was known by about 1000 BC.

Why bronze came before iron

To appreciate its significance, we need to understand the difference between bronze and iron. After the Stone Age came the Metal Age. Copper is relatively rare but melts easily. Bronze is an alloy of copper and tin. Tin is also rare. Iron is abundant but very difficult to melt. That is why the Copper Age and the Bronze Age appear first in human history, and only later the Iron Age. 

Copper and tin were both available in Central Asia, and when combined, they produced bronze. The Harappans had access to this bronze technology and perhaps even monopolised it. They carried bronze and copper goods to the Persian Gulf in small boats, and from there these goods reached Mesopotamian temples, where bronze was treated as a sacred and valuable commodity. From Mesopotamia, bronze made its way to Egypt.

We may take bronze for granted today, but back then it was rare and almost magical. It was first used for ritual and crafts, not everyday tools. Even in Harappa, stone tools continued to be used alongside bronze, showing that bronze was a luxury item. There is no clear evidence of iron in Harappan cities.

While Harappa declined, iron was smelted in India

The decline of Harappan cities is closely linked to the fate of bronze. Three reasons stand out: 

1. First, reduced supply: traders who once brought tin from Central Asia found a shorter land route to Mesopotamia through Elam (coastal Iran), bypassing the Indus River. 

2. Second, reduced demand: the Akkadian Empire, which replaced the Sumerians, did not value the exotic goods of Harappa as much as the Sumerians had. 

3. And third, climate change altered river patterns, making it harder to sustain the Indus cities. 

So the story of Harappa is not just about bricks and drains, but also about copper, tin, and bronze.

While Harappa was fading, iron was being smelted in India. Early iron sites have been found in the eastern Gangetic plains, but even more importantly, across southern India. Archaeologists have found iron in the same regions where ash mounds and megaliths are located. Ash mounds are vast deposits of burnt cattle dung, sometimes 100 metres wide and several metres high, created over generations. 

We do not know why Deccan pastoralists created them, but clearly fire was central to their culture. This interest in fire may have helped them experiment with baking clay and smelting ores.

Emerging evidence about India’s early iron age

It is even possible that the Aryans, who came to India around 1500 BC, were drawn by the prospect of trading for iron. Excavations at Keeladi in Tamil Nadu reveal an urban civilisation on the banks of the Vaigai River, with evidence of iron production dated to 600 BC. 

Notably,  India was also the home of Wootz Steel, which was developed around 500 BC in the Deccan region. This development was likely the result of earlier knowledge of smelting, alloying, etc.

And Keeladi’s deeper layers may hold even more secrets. The finds at the site echo the Harappan world: red-and-black pottery, carnelian beads, organised streets, water and sewage management, even symbols reminiscent of Harappan signs.

These new findings are still being debated, and politics often clouds the evidence. But as more excavations and studies emerge, our understanding of India’s early iron age is bound to change. It may well turn out that India was among the first centres of iron smelting in the world, reshaping how we think about ancient history.

Post read questions

Many historians have believed that the knowledge of iron smelting came from Anatolia (modern-day Türkiye), north of Mesopotamia, and spread eastward. Why is this likely to be incorrect? 

What do the archaeological findings at sites in Tamil Nadu suggest about the history of iron use in India?

In Harappa, stone tools continued to be used alongside bronze, showing that bronze was a luxury item. But how is the decline of Harappan cities closely linked to the fate of bronze? 

How did the cultural practices of Deccan pastoralists, particularly the creation of ash mounds and megaliths, possibly influence clay baking and iron smelting in southern India?

(Devdutt Pattanaik is a renowned mythologist who writes on art, culture and heritage.)

Share your thoughts and ideas on UPSC Special articles with ashiya.parveen@indianexpress.com.

Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.

Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.