On Wednesday, the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly passed a resolution on special status, seeking a “dialogue” with the Union Territory’s elected representatives for restoration of the same as well as constitutional guarantees, “and to work out constitutional mechanisms for restoring these provisions”.
The resolution, brought by the Omar Abdullah government in the first Session of the newly elected House, was carefully worded – while it fulfilled one of the key promises made by the National Conference in its election manifesto, it was careful not to ruffle feathers in the BJP-led Centre, especially when the latter seems inclined to fulfill the other big J&K demand, of return of statehood.
There were other messages too in the resolution, which marked the first formal rejection in J&K of decisions taken by the Centre on August 5, 2019, scrapping the special status of the erstwhile state via abrogation of Article 370, and its downgrade to two UTs.
The key takeaways:
Story continues below this ad
The face to move the resolution
While the NC won a simple majority on its own in the Assembly elections, almost all its numbers come from Kashmir. This was the reason that a decision was taken to appoint one of its MLAs from Jammu region, Surinder Kumar Choudhary, as the Deputy Chief Minister.
On Wednesday, the NC chose Choudhary again to table the resolution for restoration of special status in the Assembly. It implied that the demand for provisions guaranteed once by Article 370 was not restricted to the Valley alone but also the Jammu region, which was swept by the BJP in the Assembly elections. Unlike Kashmir, there is support for Article 370 abrogation in Jammu.
Speaking to reporters later, Choudhary said: “If you do a narco test of BJP MLAs, even they are happy with this resolution. But they can’t say it because of political compulsions.”
The omissions in the resolution
It talks about the restoration of special status and constitutional guarantees, but makes no mention of Articles 370 or 35 A which provided the same. It is a hint that the NC-led government, the first since the abrogation of Article 370, is ready to accept special status in the form of a mechanism other than the contentious legislation, whose removal has been part of the BJP’s original agenda.
Story continues below this ad
This could, for example, be in the shape of Article 371, which grants special provisions to some states, or other constitutional guarantees about land and job.
The resolution does not unequivocally oppose or reject the decisions of August 5, 2019, as well, only “expressing concern” over the unilateral nature of them.
The inclusions in the resolution
As the resolution says, “This Assembly emphasises that any process for restoration (of special status) must safeguard both national unity and the legitimate aspirations of the people of Jammu and Kashmir.” The framing of national unity within the demand for special status is interesting as the BJP’s main argument against Article 370 was that it treated one state distinctly from the others, and that its abrogation has led to “full integration” of J&K with the rest of the country.
PDP chief Mehbooba Mufti commented on this in her reaction to the J&K government resolution, saying: “This has nothing to do with national unity. This nation is known for its diversity and this is why J&K had joined hands with India in 1947.”
Story continues below this ad
The resolution also “calls upon the government of India to initiate dialogue with elected representatives” of J&K for the restoration of special status. Again, it suggests an eagerness to include the Centre in any move on the issue.
The view from BJP side
While the BJP vehemently opposed the resolution, seeking its withdrawal, the party only stands to benefit from the move.
First, it suggests a willingness on the part of the J&K government to work with the Centre, denting the narrative that the Valley would never accept the BJP. Second, it gives the BJP an opening to put the Congress on the mat in poll-bound Maharashtra and Jharkhand. As an ally of the NC, though not a part of the J&K government, there is only that much distance the Congress can claim from the resolution.
The view from Congress side
While the NC support base will be placated for now at the Omar government ticking the special status box – even if in a diluted form – the Congress seems as hapless as ever.
Story continues below this ad
With stakes high in the two Assembly elections coming up next, the Congress appeared as confused about its stand as when the Centre abrogated Article 370. When the resolution was first moved, it was clear its MLAs did not know how to respond. While Congress state president Tariq Karra and senior leader Peerzada Mohammad Syed watched silently, its MLA Irfan Hafiz sparred with his BJP counterparts in the Assembly.
Earlier, during the poll campaign, the Congress dodged all questions on Article 370, hiding behind plans for a “common minimum programme” with the NC.