Premium

Who moved the J&K Assembly resolution, to what it says, and doesn’t: Key takeaways from special status move

The NC’s Jammu face introduces the resolution that seems modulated for Delhi’s ears; BJP protests but set to gain

jammu and kashmir assembly resolution, political pulse, indian expressBJP legislators hold a protest after the Assembly passed a resolution on Article 370 restoration by voice vote, in Srinagar, Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2024. (PTI Photo)

On Wednesday, the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly passed a resolution on special status, seeking a “dialogue” with the Union Territory’s elected representatives for restoration of the same as well as constitutional guarantees, “and to work out constitutional mechanisms for restoring these provisions”.

The resolution, brought by the Omar Abdullah government in the first Session of the newly elected House, was carefully worded – while it fulfilled one of the key promises made by the National Conference in its election manifesto, it was careful not to ruffle feathers in the BJP-led Centre, especially when the latter seems inclined to fulfill the other big J&K demand, of return of statehood.

There were other messages too in the resolution, which marked the first formal rejection in J&K of decisions taken by the Centre on August 5, 2019, scrapping the special status of the erstwhile state via abrogation of Article 370, and its downgrade to two UTs.

The key takeaways:

Story continues below this ad

The face to move the resolution

While the NC won a simple majority on its own in the Assembly elections, almost all its numbers come from Kashmir. This was the reason that a decision was taken to appoint one of its MLAs from Jammu region, Surinder Kumar Choudhary, as the Deputy Chief Minister.

On Wednesday, the NC chose Choudhary again to table the resolution for restoration of special status in the Assembly. It implied that the demand for provisions guaranteed once by Article 370 was not restricted to the Valley alone but also the Jammu region, which was swept by the BJP in the Assembly elections. Unlike Kashmir, there is support for Article 370 abrogation in Jammu.

Speaking to reporters later, Choudhary said: “If you do a narco test of BJP MLAs, even they are happy with this resolution. But they can’t say it because of political compulsions.”

The omissions in the resolution

It talks about the restoration of special status and constitutional guarantees, but makes no mention of Articles 370 or 35 A which provided the same. It is a hint that the NC-led government, the first since the abrogation of Article 370, is ready to accept special status in the form of a mechanism other than the contentious legislation, whose removal has been part of the BJP’s original agenda.

Story continues below this ad

This could, for example, be in the shape of Article 371, which grants special provisions to some states, or other constitutional guarantees about land and job.

The resolution does not unequivocally oppose or reject the decisions of August 5, 2019, as well, only “expressing concern” over the unilateral nature of them.

The inclusions in the resolution

As the resolution says, “This Assembly emphasises that any process for restoration (of special status) must safeguard both national unity and the legitimate aspirations of the people of Jammu and Kashmir.” The framing of national unity within the demand for special status is interesting as the BJP’s main argument against Article 370 was that it treated one state distinctly from the others, and that its abrogation has led to “full integration” of J&K with the rest of the country.

PDP chief Mehbooba Mufti commented on this in her reaction to the J&K government resolution, saying: “This has nothing to do with national unity. This nation is known for its diversity and this is why J&K had joined hands with India in 1947.”

Story continues below this ad

The resolution also “calls upon the government of India to initiate dialogue with elected representatives” of J&K for the restoration of special status. Again, it suggests an eagerness to include the Centre in any move on the issue.

The view from BJP side

While the BJP vehemently opposed the resolution, seeking its withdrawal, the party only stands to benefit from the move.

First, it suggests a willingness on the part of the J&K government to work with the Centre, denting the narrative that the Valley would never accept the BJP. Second, it gives the BJP an opening to put the Congress on the mat in poll-bound Maharashtra and Jharkhand. As an ally of the NC, though not a part of the J&K government, there is only that much distance the Congress can claim from the resolution.

The view from Congress side

While the NC support base will be placated for now at the Omar government ticking the special status box – even if in a diluted form – the Congress seems as hapless as ever.

Story continues below this ad

With stakes high in the two Assembly elections coming up next, the Congress appeared as confused about its stand as when the Centre abrogated Article 370. When the resolution was first moved, it was clear its MLAs did not know how to respond. While Congress state president Tariq Karra and senior leader Peerzada Mohammad Syed watched silently, its MLA Irfan Hafiz sparred with his BJP counterparts in the Assembly.

Earlier, during the poll campaign, the Congress dodged all questions on Article 370, hiding behind plans for a “common minimum programme” with the NC.

Bashaarat Masood is a Special Correspondent with The Indian Express. He has been covering Jammu and Kashmir, especially the conflict-ridden Kashmir valley, for two decades. Bashaarat joined The Indian Express after completing his Masters in Mass Communication and Journalism from the University in Kashmir. He has been writing on politics, conflict and development. Bashaarat was awarded with the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Awards in 2012 for his stories on the Pathribal fake encounter. ... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement