Premium
This is an archive article published on November 10, 2010

Gadkari ‘owns’ Adarsh flat: Congress

The party said one flat owner is “very,very close” to the BJP's national president.

Congress on Wednesday sought to put the Opposition Bharatiya Janata Party in the dock in the Mumbai Housing Society scam alleging that one of its beneficiaries is “very very close” to party president Nitin Gadkari.

“While raising the Adarsh issue,they are not taking the name Suresh Prabhu,who was a minister in the NDA regime or Nagpur-based businessman Ajay Sancheti,who is supposed to be very very close to BJP president Nitin Gadkari.

Sancheti,reports have suggested is the BJP’s link to Adarsh,as his firm’s driver Sudhakar Madke,who earns Rs 8,600,is the owner of a flat.

Story continues below this ad

Congress party spokesperson Shakeel Ahmed told reporters: “According to reports,Sancheti’s driver has purchased a flat worth Rs 60 lakh. There is speculation in the media that Sancheti is a proxy for Nitin Gadkari.”

Reacting sharply to it,BJP spokesman Prakash Javdekar dubbed the allegations as baseless and threatened to take legal action against the Congress leader if the charges were not proved within 72 hours.

Ahmed,however,sought to sit on high moral ground for his party on the corruption issues and accused the BJP of practising “double standards” in the matter.

“Chief Minister Ashok Chavan resigned after the controversy in Adarsh case. Similarly,Suresh Kalmadi had to resign from the post of Congress Parliamentary Party secretary after the controversy on Commonwealth Games.”

Story continues below this ad

“BJP should explain what action it proposes against its senior leaders Vijay Kumar Malhotra and Tarlochan Singh who were defending Kalmadi and are seen in TV footages with the Commonwealth Organising Committee chairman. They should also spell out their stand on Sancheti and Suresh Prabhu,” Ahmed said.

He alleged that BJP is practising double standards on the issue of corruption and asked why the main Opposition party did not demand these aspects be included in investigations.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement