On the concluding day of the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) 11th biennial ministerial conference at Buenos Aires, the multilateral agency’s Director-General, Roberto Azevedo, asked its members to do some “real soul searching”. “Progress is going to require a big leap in members’ stated positions,” Azvedo said at the closing ceremony on Wednesday. His dejection wasn’t misplaced. From December 11 to December 13, WTO’s 164 members squabbled over issues related to food subsidies, but did not reach an agreement, a failure that raises questions over the multilateral body’s ability to govern the increasingly contentious arena of global trade.
Global trade norms stipulate that a WTO member country’s food subsidy bill should not exceed 10 per cent of the value of agricultural production in the country, based on the reference price of 1986-1988. India, which passed a Food Security Act in 2013, has opposed this cap. The country’s food security bill currently does not breach the 10 per cent limit, but India has taken a principled position against this ceiling. It has contended that developed countries themselves provide subsidies to agriculture that skew the global food market against farmers in the Third World. India has also argued that the ceiling could restrict the implementation of its food security programme in future.
The Buenos Aires imbroglio shines a light on one of the biggest contradictions of the WTO — the US continues to dominate the body even while it becomes increasingly inward-looking in economic matters. India plans to organise a meeting of like-minded countries on trade-related issues next year. That meeting could mark the start of efforts to make the WTO reflect global economic realities better.
