skip to content
Premium
This is an archive article published on July 18, 2011
Premium

Opinion The maximum threat

Why the city of freedom must survive so that the India it inspires can survive?

July 18, 2011 01:21 AM IST First published on: Jul 18, 2011 at 01:21 AM IST

As Mumbai’s Boswell,Suketu Mehta captured the dark side of Mumbai as effectively as he did the wonder and iconic status that define the metropolis. The alluring mistress of hope,the devil of despair,the maximum city in every which way,whether providing nightmares or building dreams. It also detailed why and how Mumbai can become an addiction. Above all,it defined what makes a Mumbaikar. It is a peculiar definition,but it manages to say a lot,much like one speaks of someone being a New Yorker. Wednesday’s terror strike has brought Mumbaikars into tragic focus once again — their legendary “resilience” and “spirit” starting to invite anger rather than pride from those who face the reality of being the favoured target for terrorists.

The reasons for that targeting go beyond the cliché of being “the financial centre”. No other city in India has that aura,and sense of destiny,that Mumbai commands. Like New York,with which it is often compared,Mumbai stands for something unique: a city that energises those who live in it,and instills a desire to excel. Such cities have become “command centres in the borderless domain of the new global economy,” as an American architect recently wrote. These are cities that cause prominent writers like Mehta,Vikram Chandra (Sacred Games,Love and Longing in Bombay) and now Aravind Adiga (Last Man in Tower) to use them as a backdrop to their novels,because of their iconic status,of the kind of people who inhabit them,and the dynamics of its neighbourhoods. Danny Boyle’s Slumdog Millionaire could only have been filmed in Mumbai to bring alive the grime and the glamour,the ambition and drive,and the dreams that it encourages its inhabitants to dream. It is that spirit which invites the terrorist’s wrath,the obsessive desire to see it broken. Mumbai is more a symbol of emerging India and its growing economic clout than any other city in India,and that’s what keeps the fidayeen plotting their twisted conspiracies while preparing the ammonium nitrate.

Advertisement

There are other reasons why Mumbai commands a special status,and not just in India. A recent meeting of architects,historians,social scientists and town planners in Paris concluded that to qualify as a “great” city or “world city”,it must exert a significant impact upon global commerce,finance,media,art,fashion,research,technology,education and entertainment. Only a handful of cities met that criteria,and Mumbai is possibly the only Indian city that does. Technology may be a Bangalore monopoly,and the media perhaps more inclined to Delhi,the centre of political power,but in every other way,Mumbai makes the grade. Its near-legendary corporate czars are now global players,their business impact being felt in every continent. In fact,the most profitable technology company in India (TCS) is based in Mumbai,not Bangalore. In the global entertainment arena,Bollywood is now as well known as Hollywood. Canadian author Neil Frazer writes: “Global cities are the sites for global finance and other specialised service firms,the sites of key innovations,including innovations in services,and they are markets for the products and innovations produced.” No other innovation in service matches the global wonder of Mumbai’s unique dabba system.

There are others. Drive in from the airport,and you now cross the Worli Sea Link,a technical and engineering accomplishment that is a lesson in innovation. Take a detour past Antilla,the richest private residence in the world. It is humungous and distorted and vulgar but it’s also a scale of ambition that only Mumbai would demand. Innovation and ambition are as much part of the Mumbai character as the underworld and the slums. Then there is the iconography: the original gateway to India,it now has a permanent signature of that status,the Gateway of India and the ever-elegant arc of Marine Drive flirting with the Arabian Sea. All along,the crumbling art deco mansions,sea salt rubbed into their wounds,express their own peculiar symbol of defiance — you can hurt us but never bring us down. There is history hidden behind those decaying walls. Crawford Market is the bustling area in a semi-dilapidated 1869 building where many Mumbaikars buy fruit,vegetables and meat. None of them know that the bas-relief work on the building exterior was done by Lockwood Kipling,Rudyard’s father.

Modern history has made it what it is today. Almost everyone in Mumbai arrived here as an immigrant over the last century,giving the city a vibrancy and cosmopolitanism that is different from other cities. Nowhere else do you find that feeling of constant movement and vibrancy: only New York has that effect. Like New York,it has a very active citizenry whose pride of place and belonging sets it apart. It’s the one place where you can make a mark and also make a difference. The actor Judy Dench once said about New York: “The city has a great capacity to transform people.” Mumbai has done that to so many,the count is lost.

Advertisement

There’s a greater urgency required to ensure that Mumbai retains its special status and sense of destiny. As nation-states wane under the transforming power of globalisation,cities are growing in power,filling in the spaces being left vacant. Mumbai can play that role if politicians,bureaucrats and security agencies allow it to. There is a terrible irony emerging,a city where people find their freedoms — of choice,of opinions,of celebrations,of living — are finding those very freedoms under severe threat,and not just from the terrorists. Mumbai must survive — and thrive — if India is to survive and thrive.

dilip.bobb@expressindia.com

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us