Ayatollah Khomeinis fatwa against Rushdie as the first global salvo of radical Islaml
When Kenan Malik arrived at the university that housed the Bradford Council of Mosques to speak to the councils chairman,Sher Azam,soon after the burning of The Satanic Verses,one of the first to meet him was his old friend Hassan from London who had lost his sense of who he was and where hes come from. Having returned to Bradford,Hassan had found a sense of community and a need to defend our dignity as Muslims
He was not going to allow anyone racist or Rushdie to trample over them.
Malik,a veteran commentator on race and multiculturalism in Britain,was born in India and migrated with his parents in the 60s,and grew up in the heyday of Paki-bashing. His politics was forged in the anti-racist struggle of the radical left a worldview that was avowedly secular and believed at the time that the world would be set right if the problem of racism was redressed. The Hassan above had been a member of the far-left Socialist Workers Party like Malik had been,and apart from Trotskyism,his other indulgences were Southern Comfort,sex and Arsenal. When Malik met him in Bradford,he found Hassans metamorphosis from left-wing wide boy to Islamic militant no less extraordinary than that of the anti-heroes of The Satanic Verses.
Ayatollah Khomeini may have issued his fatwa to checkmate his Iranian rivals and Saudi Arabias hold on global Islam,but most of world politics since has been defined by his singular action it turned a British issue,albeit with origins in India,into a global conflagration. Although The Satanic Verses was not read by its burners,its symbolic import saw its Japanese translator stabbed to death,its Norwegian publisher shot,a Penguin store firebombed and forced upon Rushdie the life of literatures biggest fugitive: The burning book became an icon of the rage of Islam the image proclaimed,I am a portent of a new kind of conflict and of a new kind of world.
From Fatwa to Jihad is a detailed and arresting recount and analysis of recent history and a valuable contribution to Rushdies own cause of free speech. However,Malik disappoints in his seeming,illogical faith that the power of the law and state can do immense good for that freedom,even if individual governments fail to do so. Nor does Malik have an antidote to the ills of multiculturalism or an alternative to something that has otherwise laid many old western ills to rest. Rest assured,the British radical left and its gospel of a homogenous secularism are passé. The Rushdie battle continues.