Bumbling nanny

The rumour campaign,and the uproar that followed,mark the end of innocence about free speech. It signals that traditional knee-jerk responses no longer suffice. Both the governments instinct to curb dissent and lampoons and the free-speech advocates determination to resist all controls,even self-control,are out of date. While the right of the government to censor communications in times of crisis is not seriously contested,the episode suggests that our internet nannies need to be better educated about the medium. Its ethos values freedom,transparency and discussion over all else. The path of least resistance is for censorship decisions to be left to specialists nominated by the government and acceptable to the people,rather than faceless bureaucrats. The process should be transparent and discussion should be allowed,perhaps using designated internet fora as public,self-governing courts of appeal.

Instead,a cocktail of incompetence and stealth have created a miasma of confusion in which suspicions of motivated over-regulation have flourished. There would have been nothing to speculate about if the government had published a list of blocked Twitter handles. Disclosure would also have forced the government to think twice about arbitrarily blocking parody accounts and people with right-wing sympathies,which has made it look like it is bumbling. And the crowning irony is that the government has nothing to say about the Twitter account of its own minister,Milind Deora,being blocked. A government that expects to lay down the law on hate speech has to play the part. It cannot be so inept.

Curated For You

Dhurandhar Box Office Collection Worldwide Day 23 Update: Ranveer Singh earns over Rs 5 cr on 4th Sunday, collects Rs 1,051.6 cr globally

Could have stayed in Mumbai and enjoyed Indian healthcare: MAGA influencer mocks death of Indian-origin man in Canada

In wake-up call to Rahul, Digvijaya lauds BJP-RSS structure, rise of Modi