Mini Kapoor
Over the past year,with Saadat Hasan Mantos centenary coming to a close on May 11,there was much striving to ascertain his place in literature. Understandably so. But in seminars and talks to mark the anniversary,it was interesting to note how the Q&A sessions that drew the audience into the discussions would take the focus away from the fiction of Manto to the mind of Manto,and from there on to the fact of Partition and the need to examine that central event on which his writing turns from across,as it were,the India-Pakistan divide that historian Ayesha Jalal speaks of in the title of her thoughtful new book.
Mantos genius as a writer of short stories about Partition,some staggering in their effect at just a few lines long,lay in his success in showing how it had destroyed the psychic equilibrium of people. Jalal,in fact,contends and this is the central argument in the book that creative writers have captured the human dimensions of partition far more effectively than have historians.
Jalals is an intimately personal inquiry in two specific ways. She is Mantos great-niece,and her task as biographer is made easier by access to a rich archive of letters and family stories. It also makes it somewhat tricky,on account of navigating the inevitable overhang of family lore. And two,she makes it a point to trace the arc of her career as a historian to the literary presence of the conspicuously absent Manto while growing up amidst his immediate family in Lahores Lakshmi Mansions. (Manto had passed away in 1955 at the age of 42.) Together,these give her material and confidence to read his mind and intent at various points in the narrative in ways not available to others who have made similar claims about his unique place in the literature of Partition.
Predictably,this renders the intellectual inquiry remarkably uncritical of Manto and even defensive,whether it be the question of his agency in hastening his death by addiction to alcohol or his place amongst his peers. This is Manto as Jalal sees him and would present to a wider readership keen on understanding his times and,in an indeterminate way,our own.
This occasionally uncritical defence of Manto,it must be clarified,does not exactly detract from the book in fact,not at all. It anchors him in a specific context in a manner that prevents him from becoming all things to all people,and,therefore,eventually just a string of platitudes,as happens all too frequently when talking of his short stories about the little tragedies of Partition. As Jalal says it herself: The Manto archive gave me the source materials to connect the micro history of an individual and a family with the macro history of communities and states during Indias partition This book reflects my efforts to interweave Mantos personal life and work with the momentous events through which he lived and that he recorded in his writings. What follows is a canvas on which the pathos of Mantos life merges imperceptibly with the pity of partition.
To this end,Jalal embeds Mantos fiction and profiles (especially of the Bombay film world of the 1940s) in a linear biography from his formative growing-up years in Amritsar,to his stint in Delhi writing plays for All India Radio,through his years in Bombay,his happiest,and finally his relocation in 1948 to Lahore,where he would be finally beaten by economic hardship and alcohol but where too he would produce his most stellar work till his eventual death. Manto was an extraordinarily prolific and famously quick writer,often finishing a story in
one sitting and the overlay of his lived life and
his published work conveys how this feat would be impossible to pull off without an essential standard of humanism and cosmopolitanism.