Premium
This is an archive article published on October 2, 2011

American strike on American target

The killing of Anwar al-Awlaki,an American citizen struck by a missile fired from a drone aircraft operated by his own government,reignited a difficult debate over terrorism,civil liberties and the law.

The killing of Anwar al-Awlaki,an American citizen struck on Friday by a missile fired from a drone aircraft operated by his own government,reignited a difficult debate over terrorism,civil liberties and the law.

For the Obama administration,al-Awlaki had joined the enemy in wartime,shifting from propaganda to an operational role in plots devised in Yemen by AQAP against the US. Early last year,officials decided his actions justified making him a target for capture or death.

But civil libertarians and Muslim-American advocates questioned how the government could take a US citizens life based on secret intelligence,without a trial. They said killing him amounted to summary execution without the due process of law guaranteed by the Constitution.

That argument was pressed unsuccessfully in federal court last year by the American Civil Liberties Union and al-Awlakis father,Nasser al-Awlaki. A federal judge threw out their lawsuit,noting that al-Awlaki had shown no interest in pursuing a claim in a US justice system he despised.

On Friday,Jameel Jaffer,ACLUs deputy legal director,said the drone strike violated US and international law. This is a program under which Americans far from any battlefield can be executed by their own government without judicial process, he said.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement