
WIll the nine o8217;clock news on Doordarshan and All India Radio be any different after September 15, when the newly notified Prasar Bharati Act, 1990, comes into force? A nation that has been fed for the last five decades on a diet of government news and views on radio and TV can only welcome any step towards greater media autonomy, however timorous. At the same time, the Union Government must bear in mind that there are important differences between real autonomy and one on paper; one that is bandied about by ministers on public fora and one that listeners and viewers can perceive and benefit from.
Autonomy for media, at its most effective, must help deepen and strengthen the democratic processes in society. Does the Prasar Bharati Act do this? Because the new Act is a declaration on the part of the government that media autonomy is a principle worthy of institutionalisation, it must be seen as important. But there are numerous grey areas as well. For one, while it provides for a supposedly independent authority to oversee the functioning of DD and AIR 8212; the Broadcasting Corporation of India 8212; this institution will, in turn, be subject to three levels of control. Two of these involve the offices of the usual suspects 8212; ministers, MPs and bureaucrats. Besides this, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communication is also certain to take an inordinate interest in it. So while the government may retire from centrestage, it has repositioned itself for possible backroom manipulation. The Act also retains with the government considerable discretionary powers. Clause 23 of the Act states that the Centre may, as and when the occasion arises, direct the Corporation in the interests of the 8220;sovereignty, unity and integrity8221; of the country not to make a broadcast on a particular matter or to highlight something of public importance. While such a proviso is in order, there is considerable scope for its misuse in the hands of an unscrupulous government.