
Monday8217;s firing on agitating farmers in Madhya Pradesh8217;s Betul district, conforms to a sadly familiar pattern. Just three months ago, similar scenes were enacted in Haryana8217;s Mahendragarh district when six farmers were killed in police firing while they were agitating for free electricity. The farmers in Betul, frustrated over the damage that the recent hailstorms and floods had done to their crops, allegedly tried to set a police vehicle on fire in protest against State apathy. At least 16 died in the subsequent police action. Both incidents were as tragic as they were avoidable. They underline the tremendous frustration in the countryside, especially among the farming community. Rightly or wrongly, there is a growing view that policies and plans that are being evolved in the urban power centres of the country are not sufficiently sensitive to grassroot reality.
Political expediency has made the situation worse. One of the favourite electoral ploys of ambitious politicians is to promise free electricity, state subsidies and loans for farmers. Subsequent governments find it difficult, even impossible, to honour such commitments. And so the tensions grow. While the Union and state governments do have a responsibility to protect the interests of farmers, they should at the same time guard against creating a dependency syndrome whereby the responsibility for every reversal, natural or otherwise, is laid at the door of the State. The old Confucian adage that giving a man a fish will provide him a meal, but teaching him to fish will ensure a lifetimeacirc;euro;trade;s meals, holds true in this instance as well. Itacirc;euro;trade;s far better if systems like crop insurance and cheap credit are put in place to deal with periods of distress.