Premium
This is an archive article published on March 24, 2006

Letters To The Editor

Way to go • This has reference to the Indian Express of March 24 and the lead article in it. I am a great admirer of your paper but...

.

Way to go

This has reference to the Indian Express of March 24 and the lead article in it. I am a great admirer of your paper but I find that you seem to lose your sense of proportion, fair play and vocabulary when it comes to Sonia Gandhi — and her sacrifice. Your paper has stood for principles throughout its history. So why should Sonia’s action be judged differently and so contemptuously by you? Have the people of this country become so inured to the chicanery, corruption and hypocrisy of its politicians that they are too cynical to recognise a principled stand when they see it? Sonia Gandhi has once again proved she is a woman of substance.
I applaud her.

— Cynthia Reilly Mumbai

Iconic abstinence?

Sonia Gandhi’s decision to resign as MP and chairperson of NAC was prompted not by of her “inner voice” but by the Indian Express’s clear wake-up call to the nation, on how the UPA government was attempting to save her position by locking up Parliament and issuing an ordinance. Even now Congress spinmeisters are attempting to portray this sordid episode as a ‘second sacrifice’ by their leader. Maybe they should go the whole hog and add Nehru-Gandhi tyaga to the asvammedha and rajasuya sacrifices of Vedic era. That would steal the thunder from the Hindutva types.

— R. P. Subramanian Delhi

Post facto

Story continues below this ad

Sonia Gandhi’s resignation move (‘Sonia sees profit in quitting office’, IE, March 24) was tinged with compulsion. She almost did again what she had done two years ago, making a show of sacrifice. If she is really conscientious, she should have quit immediately after Jaya Bachchan’s disqualification. Didn’t she know the rules? Her resignation is a good political move. She needed to stop the Opposition in their campaign and an ordinance to bail her out would have shown her in bad light. She is not interested in holding posts, she says. Then why does she contest elections?

— Amjad K. Maruf Mumbai

Handled sans care

Far from the inner voice of her conscience, as pointed out in your editorial ‘Inner voice: now lost’ (IE, March 24), Sonia Gandhi’s resignation was no more than a strategy. The ordinance would have gone against the Congress’s assembly election prospects in the five states. The act was not an expression of her desire to “serve the people”, nor is it exactly a shrewd move to impress. It was a fallout of the UPA’s sloppy handling of the crisis. First they force Jaya Bachchan’s disqualification and then plan an ordinance, to which end Parliament is suddenly adjourned sine die. In apprehension of public discontent, Sonia Gandhi then strikes the posture of self-denial.

— Ved Guliani, Hisar

Total view

Your March 24 editorial page brings to mind a submarine commander who, before surfacing his boat, sticks his periscope up to take an all round view of the horizon. You have done just that to utter perfection: inner voice: now lost; law is not an ass; Indira to Sonia (no one profits by political worship); the gamble of a daughter-in-law (much depends on how the weapon of her resignation is used). The Op-Ed page, with its story on Maharashtra’s political geography; the new spring in Iraq, and ‘The sign of the Scorpene’, was also commendable. That last bit was by none other than a former submarine commander, Raja Menon! Three cheers and more to the Express, and more power to your elbow!

— Mukund B. Kunte Delhi

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement