Journalism of Courage
Advertisement
Premium

India146;s interest first

While the CPM can afford to reduce foreign policy to a set of slogans, no responsible government in Delhi can waver in the defence of nation...

.

While the CPM can afford to reduce foreign policy to a set of slogans, no responsible government in Delhi can waver in the defence of national interest in challenging circumstances like the one presented by Iran8217;s nuclear proliferation. As The Sunday Express reported, India8217;s relationship with Iran is a mix of positive and negative. It is not non-aligned solidarity but hard-nosed calculus on energy security and transit to Afghanistan, as well as the shared threat of the Taliban , which brought both countries together. However, Iran8217;s attitude to the Kashmir question at the OIC and India8217;s permanent membership of the UNSC have always been disconcerting to New Delhi.

On the all important nuclear issue, which is what is at stake in the current debate at the IAEA8212; Indo-Iranian differences are unbridgeable. Iran has pressed in various international forums for the universal membership of the NPT8212; in other words, asking India to give up its nuclear weapons and join the NPT as a non-nuclear state. India8217;s primary national interest lies in ending its own nuclear isolation and regaining access to international atomic energy trade through the July nuclear pact with the US. It cannot allow any other consideration to come in the way of this long-standing strategic objective. For ideological reasons, the Left may be committed to defending Iranian proliferation. But it is not India8217;s job to make it easy for Iran to acquire nuclear weapons.

The Left claim that India has departed from the principle of non-alignment in voting against Iran at the IAEA last month is both ahistoric and ignorant. The Communists themselves were late converts to non-alignment. Rubbishing it in the 8217;50s, it discovered its 8220;anti-imperialist virtues8221; in the late 8217;70s. Non-alignment never prevented India from pursuing its own national interest. It condoned the Vietnamese intervention in Cambodia and the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the late 8217;70s. The Indo-Soviet security treaty of 8217;71 violated the strict cannon of non-alignment, but was seen as necessary at a critical moment. So was Nehru8217;s tilt to the US, following the Chinese aggression of 8217;62. The Left likes deviations from non-alignment when it defines them as 8220;progressive8221;. But for Indian governments, there can only be one over-arching principle 8212; defending India8217;s national interest.

Curated For You

 

Tags:
Weather
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Neerja Chowdhury ColumnAs BJP wins BMC qila, why the echoes of its civic poll success will travel far beyond Maharashtra
X