Premium
This is an archive article published on July 8, 1999

High Court orders DNA test of sold twin’

CHANDIGARH, JULY 7: For finding out "whether the male child", allegedly "sold to someone" after delivery at the Post ...

.

CHANDIGARH, JULY 7: For finding out "whether the male child", allegedly "sold to someone" after delivery at the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research here, "was really born to the petitioner", the Punjab and Haryana High Court today ordered the conducting of DNA test.

Pronouncing the orders in the open court, Justice T. H. B. Chalapathi of the High Court directed the petitioner along with "her infant daughter, who was alleged to be twin of the male child in question, to be present in the court at 10 a.m. on July 12, 1999".

Justice Chalapathi also directed a Ropar resident "to bring the boy, who has been in his custody", on the same date and at the same time.

Story continues below this ad

In his two-page order, Justice Chalapathi observed: "In case the petitioner and the infant children are present in the court on that date, they will be taken to the Director of the PGI, Chandigarh, by the Joint Registrar (Rules) of this court, S. N. Aggarwal, and the PGI Director, in his presence, will collect blood samples and any of the samples required from the petitioner and both the children and give the samples packed and sealed to him to be send to Hyderabad for conducting the DNA test".

Justice Chalapathi further observed: "As to who has to meet the expenses of the DNA test will be decided later. The Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Taranaka, Hyderabad, will conduct the test without insisting on the deposit of any expenses for the same and submit its report directly to this court as to whether the petitioner Ramanjit Kaur has given birth to the male child whose samples have been sent to the institute for the determination of maternity". The case will now come up on August 3 for report and for further arguments.

Earlier, accusing the PGI authorities of having "handed over only the female child", petitioner Ramanjit Kaur of Ropar district had alleged that "enquiries from certain Class-IV employees of the PGI, whose names were not known to her, had revealed that two children had been born to her".

Claiming to have been informed about the twins by a Ropar doctor after going through the ultra-sound report, the petitioner had stated that the fact was confirmed by the PGI authorities also.

Story continues below this ad

The counsel for the petitioner had further submitted that Superintendent of Police, deputed by the Ropar Senior Superintendent of Police to visit "the probable places where the male child could have been taken after kidnapping", had taken the photographs of the boy playing at the residence of the Ropar resident.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement