Premium
This is an archive article published on March 24, 2004

HC invites cable to poll party, EC in fix

The Election Commission is caught in a peculiar situation with the Andhra Pradesh High Court, in an interim order, suspending Rule 73 of t...

.

The Election Commission is caught in a peculiar situation with the Andhra Pradesh High Court, in an interim order, suspending Rule 73 of the Cable Network Regulation Act, 1995 that bars political advertisements in the electronic media.

Reacting to the HC order, EC spokesperson and Deputy Election Commissioner A.N. Jha said the commission is awaiting a copy of the order and will decide the next course of action only after studying it thoroughly.

What has made matters worse for the EC is the fact that the 8216;advertising code8217; of the Cable Network Regulation Act 1995 passed by Parliament 8212; applicable at all times 8212; prohibits advertisements of political and religious nature, but is not related to elections as such. Just as it prohibits advertisements that derides any race/caste/creed or anything that incites violence, the Act states: 8216;8216;No advertisement shall be permitted the objects whereof are wholly or mainly of a religious or political nature; advertisements must not be directed towards any religious or political end.8217;8217;

While Gemini Television Network had filed a petition in the wake of a circular sent by the EC to the government, drawing attention to the provision of the Act and asking it to implement it, sources in the EC said: 8216;8216;Parliament and the government should decide the next course of action. How do we come into the picture? It is not related to elections, the issue addresses basic tenets of the Constitution. Besides, Andhra HC had put a stay on the EC8217;s directive banning political advertisement during the polls way back in Nov 2003.8217;8217;

It was in February this year that the EC discovered this particular provision of the Act. In fact, it was brought to the EC8217;s notice by the Law Ministry, which directed the government to find ways to implement it. 8216;8216;The idea is to also provide a level playing ground for all political parties. Not all of them can afford ads on prime time TV,8217;8217; the sources in the EC said.

However, both political parties and TV networks have been crying foul about the revenue lost in the process and saying 8216;8216;the right of the public to know8217;8217; has been denied.

With the campaign pitch rising, the ball seems to have landed in the EC8217;s court again. 8216;8216;But it is not entirely under our purview. However, the SC may have to sort out the matter,8217;8217; a source in the EC said.

Story continues below this ad

For the broadcasters who charge anywhere between Rs 10,000 and above for a 30-second political commercial, the order could not have come at a more appropriate time. TV advertisements, broadcasters say, reach out to a wider audience whereas print ads target only the literate few. Simply put, they add, print media is restricted to the local audience while television reaches out to the widest audience possible.

A Congress leader said, 8216;8216;The Congress has been in favour of advertising that is not personal and slanderous and which follows the programme code prescribed by the electronic media.8217;8217; The BJP, meanwhile, said it will wait for a clear directive from the EC.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement