The Lakme Leg Week received more coverage than the political dressing down Vajpayee gave Laloo Yadav, Sheila Dikshit’s early summer woes collection or the bandh-gala war of words between Dr Singh and Mr Advani. Merciful God. It’s become real tiresome to see politicians in the same clothes, saying the same things: time they got a makeover — the kind NDTV gave Preeti and Rahul during the Lakme week.
Lakme Fashion Week was all limbs, heads of antlers or birds’ nests. Individual designers kindly explained their creations that to those of us who can’t tell the retro from the metro, looked like what, technically, they were: cut up cloth. When Ritu Kumar told us her clothes were a throwback to the ‘‘classic sixties’’, we took her word for it not knowing a sixties from the seventies. To the untrained eye of the average viewer, the collections of Rini Dhaka, Rocky S, Suneet Verma, etc., looked pretty much like Kumar’s. As for Sabyasachi, Jassi made a spectacle of herself before his models wore glasses. The fashion funda here is TV channels don’t take into account that most of us cannot tell a clothes hangar from the aircraft one. They provide reams of ramp-aging girls and boys — usually clones of each other and FTV — knowing full well we could never fit into those clothes (even supposing we wanted to). They look fashionable and we feel frumpy. The only people to benefit from a week of LFW on TV, are the designers and Lakme who received loads of free advertising.
Headlines Today gets a free garment from LFW for the most unusual show — Fashion Police. Here, two self-styled fashion experts assess celebrities. Since there were none, they turned to Bina Ramani or Nisha Singh. The idea was to do on air what, we suspect, happened at the event: bitch about how everyone (but you) looked. However, the ‘judges’ gave their victims high marks, so why bother? The makeover obsession is not restricted to Jassi. Throughout LFW, NDTV had 14 guinea human beings who arrived at the event looking like a couple but after Makeover, they may have sued for a divorce on grounds of unrecognizable differences! Take Preeti and Rahul-excited-to-be-here from Udaipur. Preeti with ‘‘an Indian face and Indian hair’’ came out in wavy hair and scraped into a white linen dress. Rahul repeated one stock phrase: ‘‘I am feeling very nice’’ when you could clearly see he was feeling very nervous. His hair was shorn and gelled, his patterned shirt was hangin’ loose and the designers told him he looked ‘‘very young’’. ‘‘I am feeling very nice,’’ he said looking very stunned and unlike himself.
Talk of mismatches, here’s one that Pope Benedict would sternly disapprove of. On the day that the smoke blew white and Cardinal Ratzinger appeared on the balcony as the new pontiff, Aaj Tak placed him in box alongside the bar girls of Mumbai! How’s that for the sacred and the profane?
And speaking of people who stick to one phrase in a tight spot like poor Rahul, what about Gautam Goswami in The Indian Express flood relief scam? Each time anchor Barkha Dutt asked a question (It is said people are jealous of you, what is your relationship with Sadhu Yadav, have you been made a scapegoat, etc) he replied, ‘‘I can’t comment’’ — then why come on the show? —‘‘The Vigilance Inquiry will bring out everything…’’
Lastly, the Davis Cup from Jaipur (DD Sports). Here we are in the Pink City, said the man in a pink-mauve shirt, where there is beautiful weather and the brilliance of the sun shining down on the brilliance of the Indian players who have played brilliantly to conquer their opponents (or words to that effect). If ‘‘brilliant ’’ against Uzbekistan (on grass), what would he have said of stronger opponents on clay? And, would someone please explain what the commentator meant when he said during the first set of the first match between Paes and Dostov after a break Paes’ serve: ‘‘Woh match pehli baar haare woh’’?
Where are you Vijay Amrithraj?